TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 UL Monroe  9-24 (0.273)  |  Sun Belt
All-Play Percentage: 0.249 (265th)
Schedule Strength: 0.489 (168th)
Record Quality: -0.274 (305th)
Avg. Season Rank: 271.79 (277th)
Pace: 67.26 (313th)
Momentum: -0.11 (177th)
Off. Momentum: 0.68 (176th)
Def. Momentum: -0.79 (194th)
Consistency: -7.52 (27th)
Res. Consistency: -9.54 (63rd)
Away From Home: -1.38 (287th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.00 (266th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 95.42 19.82 66.12 87.34 41.30 30.95 32.88 28.85 34.49 27.55 57.88 8.58 14.51 6.37 35.43 33.03 31.54 2.04
RANK: 280th 350th 299th 4th 292nd 130th 280th 47th 266th 215th 221st 298th 179th 196th 197th 77th 279th 218th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.96 26.66 -- 84.60 44.28 30.62 36.78 23.63 33.84 30.34 59.98 11.46 15.35 7.39 36.20 27.93 35.87 2.00
RANK: 206th 139th -- 290th 167th 228th 256th 172nd 63rd 254th 164th 231st 235th 237th 178th 138th 212th 206th

ANALYSIS:
If you're looking for a squad in the bottom quartile of all Division I basketball teams this year, UL Monroe likely fits the bill. Carrying a record of 9-24, they are currently rated #265 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the #11 team (out of 12) in the Sun Belt (average ranking 182.6).

UL Monroe is not one of the most productive teams on offense. Scoring fewer than 96 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are rated at #280 in offensive efficiency. UL Monroe does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 19.82 vs. AO, they are second from the bottom in the overall rankings for that category. If UL Monroe does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to successfully get off shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of 87.34 vs. AO, which ranks #4 in college basketball.

Though they rate better on defense than they do on offense, UL Monroe still isn't one of the more capable defensive teams in college hoops. Allowing roughly 104 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #206 in the nation in defensive efficiency. UL Monroe will fail to secure many opportunities to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked #298 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 8.58 vs. AO.

UL Monroe is one of the more consistent teams in Division I (presently ranked 27th in consistency), so forecasting the outcomes of their future contests tends to be easier than the norm.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that do not defend well on the perimeter, UL Monroe usually performs better than average. UL Monroe is more efficient than normal 89% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 36.92%. In all other contests, UL Monroe performs better than average 41% of the time.
UL Monroe is typically worse vs. teams that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. Against foes that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.32, UL Monroe performs above their norm 41% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 89% of the time.
When facing teams that have trouble defending the mid-range shot, UL Monroe often performs better than normal. UL Monroe is more efficient than usual 68% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.02%. In their other contests, UL Monroe performs better than the norm 22% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox