Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Charlotte 9-16 (0.360) | Conference USA

All-Play Percentage: 0.295 (252^nd)	Schedule Strength: 0.484 (191^st)	Record Quality: -0.117 (229^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 199.34 (196^th)
Pace: 65.87 (342^nd)	Momentum: -4.99 (325^th)	Off. Momentum: -2.89 (325^th)	Def. Momentum: -2.10 (275^th)
Consistency: -11.45 (332^nd)	Res. Consistency: -14.38 (276^th)	Away From Home: -0.70 (250^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: 0.21 (96^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

92.52

25.57

72.63

76.91

42.46

27.88

30.99

22.22

38.50

26.80

57.66

11.24

10.54

3.78

36.25

28.90

34.85

2.01

RANK:

289^th

138^th

128^th

347^th

230^th

277^th

301^st

207^th

161^st

229^th

216^th

160^th

291^st

219^th

160^th

152^nd

135^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

101.80

20.57

80.84

46.49

31.63

34.24

18.93

40.74

30.29

62.88

11.16

11.25

4.40

39.12

23.41

37.46

2.02

RANK:

209^th

39^th

111^th

297^th

219^th

195^th

21^st

263^rd

270^th

299^th

183^rd

83^rd

109^th

253^rd

26^th

294^th

209^th

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but Charlotte should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. Their record this season is 9-16, and the club is ranked 252nd overall (out of 357) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #11 team (out of 14) in Conference USA (average ranking 168.8).

Charlotte is not one of the better offensive teams you will find. They are rated #289 in efficiency on that end of the court and only score about 93 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Charlotte happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked 347th in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 76.91 vs. AO.

Though they rate better on defense than they do on offense, Charlotte still isn't one of the more capable defensive teams in college hoops. Allowing roughly 102 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #209 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Charlotte does not stand out in a positive manner when they're asked to defend in the paint. The team is ranked 299th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 62.9% of their attempts from close-up. If Charlotte does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success preventing opponents from getting to the free throw line. The team has a defensive free throw attempt rate of 20.57 vs. AO, which ranks 39th-best in the country.

Charlotte has recently performed below their norm from an efficiency standpoint. The team is currently ranked 325th in the country in positive momentum. Charlotte has also been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 332nd in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Fri 11/27/2020	vs ECU₁₇₈	L 60.61 - 62.05	L 57-66	0-1	90.11	80.47	▼ 9.64	96.59	100.65	▼ 4.06	▼ 13.70
Fri 12/4/2020	vs Georgia State₁₇₁	L 66.97 - 69.04	L 65-76	0-2	96.65	89.41	▼ 7.24	103.25	113.49	▼ 10.24	▼ 17.48
Mon 12/7/2020	vs S. Carolina St.₃₅₃	W 73.21 - 56.43	W 78-40	1-2	103.47	112.43	▲ 8.96	83.51	59.85	▲ 23.66	▲ 32.62
Fri 12/11/2020	vs Appalachian St.₂₄₄	W 61.33 - 59.11	L 57-61	1-3	94.84	86.23	▼ 8.61	95.03	88.66	▲ 6.37	▼ 2.24
Tue 12/15/2020	@ Davidson₆₆	L 54.65 - 69.33	W 63-52	2-3	92.34	106.86	▲ 14.52	112.16	86.75	▲ 25.41	▲ 39.93
Sat 12/19/2020	vs NC A&T₃₂₂	W 70.86 - 62.34	W 76-72	3-3	100.75	111.30	▲ 10.55	93.26	111.23	▼ 17.97	▼ 7.42
Tue 12/22/2020	@ G. Washington₂₆₀	L 65.12 - 67.44	W 66-65	4-3	99.07	105.26	▲ 6.19	99.00	99.42	▼ 0.42	▲ 5.77
Fri 1/1/2021	vs W. Kentucky₉₅	L 58.83 - 66.67	L 63-67	4-4	88.12	87.54	▼ 0.58	104.16	97.85	▲ 6.31	▲ 5.73
Sat 1/2/2021	vs W. Kentucky₉₅	L 58.83 - 66.67	W 75-71 (OT)	5-4	88.12	93.38	▲ 5.26	104.16	96.26	▲ 7.90	▲ 13.16
Sat 1/9/2021	vs Bel Abbey	---	L 72-75 (OT)	5-5	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Fri 1/15/2021	vs UAB₁₀₁	L 57.28 - 64.99	L 37-61	5-6	86.40	45.86	▼ 40.54	101.95	116.72	▼ 14.77	▼ 55.31
Sat 1/16/2021	vs UAB₁₀₁	L 57.28 - 64.99	W 70-55	6-6	86.40	116.83	▲ 30.43	101.95	93.52	▲ 8.43	▲ 38.86
Fri 1/22/2021	@ FAU₁₈₂	L 59.78 - 66.52	L 53-66 (OT)	6-7	93.69	75.67	▼ 18.02	98.91	70.33	▲ 28.58	▲ 10.56
Sat 1/23/2021	@ FAU₁₈₂	L 59.78 - 66.52	W 74-71	7-7	93.69	115.98	▲ 22.29	98.91	108.37	▼ 9.46	▲ 12.83
Fri 1/29/2021	vs FIU₂₉₃	W 68.02 - 62.34	W 63-55 (OT)	8-7	98.70	74.13	▼ 24.57	94.26	74.20	▲ 20.06	▼ 4.51
Sat 1/30/2021	vs FIU₂₉₃	W 68.02 - 62.34	W 68-65	9-7	98.70	109.34	▲ 10.64	94.26	108.69	▼ 14.43	▼ 3.79
Fri 2/5/2021	@ Mid Tennessee₃₀₄	W 61.77 - 60.75	L 65-66	9-8	95.20	105.31	▲ 10.11	90.50	102.62	▼ 12.12	▼ 2.01
Sat 2/6/2021	@ Mid Tennessee₃₀₄	W 61.77 - 60.75	L 60-73	9-9	95.20	105.59	▲ 10.39	90.50	123.53	▼ 33.03	▼ 22.64
Wed 2/10/2021	vs Old Dominion₁₆₇	L 61.33 - 63.44	L 76-78 (OT)	9-10	92.13	102.34	▲ 10.21	99.44	106.62	▼ 7.18	▲ 3.03
Sat 2/13/2021	@ Old Dominion₁₆₇	L 58.61 - 66.14	L 45-64	9-11	92.13	70.47	▼ 21.66	99.44	102.95	▼ 3.51	▼ 25.17
Sat 2/27/2021	@ UTEP₁₂₂	L 57.25 - 67.69	L 47-70	9-12	90.26	56.30	▼ 33.96	101.82	113.92	▼ 12.10	▼ 46.06
Sun 2/28/2021	@ UTEP₁₂₂	L 57.25 - 67.69	L 62-77	9-13	90.26	73.49	▼ 16.77	101.82	129.11	▼ 27.29	▼ 44.06
Fri 3/5/2021	@ Marshall₉₄	L 62.23 - 76.80	L 67-75	9-14	91.17	96.00	▲ 4.83	108.15	106.17	▲ 1.98	▲ 6.81
Sat 3/6/2021	@ Marshall₉₄	L 62.23 - 76.80	L 66-75	9-15	91.17	96.42	▲ 5.25	108.15	105.01	▲ 3.14	▲ 8.39
Wed 3/10/2021	vs UTSA₁₄₈ *	L 65.14 - 71.37	L 62-72	9-16	95.02	84.51	▼ 10.51	103.99	102.86	▲ 1.13	▼ 9.38
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Charlotte does better vs. clubs that convert well from outside the arc. When playing squads that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.00%, Charlotte performs above average 100% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 31% of the time.
	Charlotte performs better against squads that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.56%, Charlotte is more efficient than normal 83% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 25% of the time.
	When playing teams that allow more chances at the line, Charlotte usually performs worse than average. Charlotte is more efficient than normal 33% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 23.29. In all other contests, Charlotte performs better than average 89% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Kinsey, Taylor lead Marshall over Charlotte 75-66 (3/6/2021 4:28:53 PM) HUNTINGTON, W.Va. (AP) — Taevion Kinsey scored 23 points and Andrew Taylor a season-high 21 as Marshall beat Charlotte 75-66 to close the regular season on Saturday.
	UTEP beats Charlotte 77-62 (2/28/2021 5:17:04 PM) EL PASO, Texas (AP) — Souley Boum and Bryson Williams scored 23 points apiece as UTEP beat Charlotte 77-62 on Sunday.
	Old Dominion tops Charlotte in OT on last-second basket (2/10/2021 10:32:26 PM) CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) — Malik Curry made a layup with a second left in overtime to lift Old Dominion to a 78-76 win over Charlotte on Wednesday night.
	Hot shooting lifts Middle Tennessee past Charlotte 73-60 (2/6/2021 7:27:26 PM) MURFREESBORO, Tenn. (AP) — Jordan Davis scored 17 points, Elias King and Tyler Millin added career-highs with 15 and 13 points, respectively, and Middle Tennessee beat Charlotte 73-60 on Saturday.
	Mom frustrated after neighborhood HOA demands removal of 11-year-old's basketball hoop (2/5/2021 10:17:31 AM) CHARLOTTE, N.C. (WJZY) — A North Carolina mom said her neighborhood homeowner’s association has ordered her to take down her son's beloved basketball hoop. Lindsey Van Winkle, of Charlotte, said it's frustrating and that her son just wants to play safely at h…

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox