TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Charleston  31-4 (0.886)  |  Colonial
All-Play Percentage: 0.773 (83rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.356 (271st)
Record Quality: 0.344 (29th)
Avg. Season Rank: 91.46 (92nd)
Pace: 71.27 (26th)
Momentum: 1.22 (113th)
Off. Momentum: -1.44 (304th)
Def. Momentum: 2.66 (19th)
Consistency: -6.48 (4th)
Res. Consistency: -9.08 (24th)
Away From Home: -1.39 (276th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.61 (241st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 107.53 28.29 74.46 87.02 42.49 38.96 32.12 18.08 37.28 29.97 59.13 13.06 16.74 4.73 44.78 20.78 34.45 2.10
RANK: 91st 54th 81st 68th 261st 8th 283rd 338th 203rd 149th 165th 59th 45th 242nd 14th 347th 201st 329th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.77 20.40 -- 84.60 44.06 26.28 31.66 29.44 37.18 28.89 62.35 8.91 12.61 5.14 31.06 34.79 34.15 1.97
RANK: 63rd 20th -- 172nd 179th 18th 58th 346th 153rd 148th 297th 36th 73rd 159th 18th 351st 145th 286th

ANALYSIS:
Despite having one of the better win percentages in Division I, Charleston doesn't quite make it into our list of college basketball's best 25 teams. Ranked 83rd overall (out of 363) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 31-4. They are also ranked by this site as the best team (out of 13) in the Colonial (average ranking 250.3).

Charleston has a fairly effective defensive attack. Occupying the #63 slot in our defensive efficiency ratings, they will allow about 97 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Charleston is a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 20.40 vs. AO, they are currently rated 20th in the country in that category. Charleston also owns a pretty good track record against teams that shoot the three. They rank 58th in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 31.7% of their attempts from afar. For this reason, AO takes nowhere near as many threes as they typically would -- just 31.1% of AO's field goal attempts will be from downtown.

Charleston plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 91st nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 108 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Charleston lives and dies by the three-ball and will launch from long-distance early and often. The team ranks 14th in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. Strangely enough, though they shoot a fair amount of threes, they really don't make a whole lot, converting only about 32.1% of their attempts from behind the arc vs. AO. Charleston also does a pretty good job of protecting the ball when they have possession and not allowing quick and easy baskets off of their own turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.91, which ranks #36 in the country.

Charleston is one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked fourth in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Charleston does worse vs. clubs that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.25%, Charleston performs above average 29% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 70% of the time.
Charleston performs worse against squads that effectively clean the offensive glass. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 12.10, Charleston is more efficient than normal 29% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 70% of the time.
When playing teams that tend to get off more shots, Charleston usually performs worse than average. Charleston is more efficient than normal 18% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 85.46. In all other contests, Charleston performs better than average 52% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox