TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Furman  28-8 (0.778)  |  Southern
All-Play Percentage: 0.749 (91st)
Schedule Strength: 0.412 (219th)
Record Quality: 0.222 (71st)
Avg. Season Rank: 107.81 (105th)
Pace: 68.66 (130th)
Momentum: -1.48 (246th)
Off. Momentum: 0.27 (197th)
Def. Momentum: -1.74 (240th)
Consistency: -8.49 (87th)
Res. Consistency: -13.35 (266th)
Away From Home: 0.32 (76th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.14 (202nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 110.90 27.73 73.87 84.45 45.90 37.33 34.56 15.35 35.43 31.77 64.29 11.19 12.50 5.01 44.21 18.17 37.62 2.07
RANK: 48th 68th 105th 183rd 68th 18th 146th 354th 298th 88th 38th 150th 262nd 204th 20th 356th 84th 280th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.21 24.93 -- 83.59 45.06 28.05 32.32 23.15 37.25 32.39 61.67 10.31 14.08 6.52 33.56 27.69 38.74 1.95
RANK: 159th 174th -- 131st 243rd 66th 80th 159th 159th 305th 279th 145th 203rd 316th 74th 170th 317th 318th

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Furman, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. They are ranked #91 (out of 363) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 28-8. Of the 10 schools in the Southern (average ranking 210.0), they're currently ranked as the best team in the conference.

Furman has a reasonably potent offensive attack. Occupying the #48 slot in our offensive efficiency rankings, they will score about 111 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Furman lives and dies by the three-ball and will launch from long-distance early and often. The team ranks 20th in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. When it comes to actually making their three-point attempts, the squad shoots a so-so 34.6% from beyond the arc vs. AO. Furman also has the potential to make you pay if you let them get close to the rim. The team is ranked 38th in the country in near-proximity field goal percentage, making approximately 64.3% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO.

Though they're not quite as efficient defensively as they are offensively, Furman still does OK when the opposition has possession of the ball. The team ranks 159th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 102 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Furman owns a pretty good track record against teams that shoot the three. They rank 80th in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 32.3% of their attempts from afar. If Furman does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's issues trying to stop opponents from obtaining and converting second-chance opportunities via offensive rebounds. The squad has a defensive second-chance conversion percentage of 6.5% vs. AO, which ranks 48th-worst in the nation.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities, Furman often performs better than normal. Furman is more efficient than usual 82% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 86.55. In their other contests, Furman performs better than the norm 36% of the time.
Furman does worse vs. clubs that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.79, Furman performs above average 31% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 71% of the time.
Furman performs worse against squads that allow more chances at the line. When facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 24.76, Furman is more efficient than normal 31% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 71% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox