Automated Team Capsule for 2018-19 Furman25-8 (0.758) | Southern
All-Play Percentage: 0.776 (80th)
Schedule Strength: 0.461 (217th)
Record Quality: 0.225 (67th)
Avg. Season Rank: 103.16 (98th)
Pace: 67.88 (223rd)
Momentum: -0.89 (215th)
Off. Momentum: 1.12 (129th)
Def. Momentum: -2.01 (263rd)
Consistency: -9.62 (190th)
Res. Consistency: -11.67 (141st)
Away From Home: 0.38 (123rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.67 (298th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 8, 2019. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
105.79
67.89
19.33
72.11
86.06
39.19
45.54
38.33
13.46
35.11
15.18
5.49
36.16
32.55
20.25
62.21
14.65
12.54
6.65
44.54
17.64
37.82
2.07
RANK:
118th
220th
346th
146th
65th
58th
101st
20th
26th
145th
325th
317th
160th
85th
65th
89th
33rd
232nd
88th
38th
333rd
126th
255th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
96.43
67.88
22.43
--
84.38
35.74
42.36
30.96
9.63
31.10
22.28
7.98
35.80
31.14
18.13
58.23
11.74
14.67
6.31
36.69
26.40
36.91
2.00
RANK:
49th
124th
36th
--
203rd
113th
87th
128th
40th
23rd
249th
245th
162nd
206th
166th
114th
187th
270th
207th
106th
243rd
189th
222nd
ANALYSIS: This website places Furman in the top 25% of all NCAA college basketball teams this year. They have a record of 25-8 and are ranked 80th overall (out of 353) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #2 team (out of 10) in the Southern (average ranking 185.9).
The primary strength for Furman is defense. The team is ranked 49th in efficiency, allowing fewer than 97 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Furman does an outstanding job shutting down the opposition from behind the arc. They rank 23rd in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 31.1% of their attempts from afar. Furman also does a pretty solid job providing themselves chances to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked 33rd in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 14.65.
Furman is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 118th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 106 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Furman will make a concerted effort to fire off quite a few three-pointers each game. The team ranks 38th in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. When it comes to actually making their three-point attempts, the squad shoots a so-so 35.1% from beyond the arc vs. AO. Furman also does a pretty decent job in most cases to maximize opportunities to score on offense. The team is ranked 65th in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 86.06 vs. AO. As far as making those field goal attempts goes, the team is somewhat middle-of-the-road, converting about 45.5% of them vs. AO. If Furman does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's inability to get to the free throw line. The squad has a free throw attempt rate of only 19.33 vs. AO, which ranks eighth-worst in the country.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Furman does better vs. clubs that do not defend well on the perimeter. When playing squads that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.52%, Furman performs above average 78% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 38% of the time.
Furman performs better against squads that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities. When facing teams that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 81.64, Furman is more efficient than normal 65% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 31% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
NIT Tournament 2019: Bracket and Schedule with Round 2 on Approach (3/21/2019 1:02:00 PM) A couple of six seeds sent three seeds home early, with Harvard scoring a 71-68 knockout of Georgetown and Wichita State clawing out a 76-70 ouster of Furman. The 16 teams who escaped the first ...
Marshall Reaches 500-Mark in N.I.T. Victory at Furman (3/21/2019 10:57:00 AM) GREENVILLE, S.C. – Gregg Marshall notched his 500th career victory in Wichita State’s 76-70 win at Furman on Wednesday night in the first round of the National Invitation Tournament. Markis McDuffie scored a team-high 20 points for the Shockers (20-14 ...
Marshall secures 500th career win as Shockers take Furman (3/21/2019 7:33:00 AM) Wichita State men’s basketball coach Gregg Marshall secured his 500th career win when the Shockers defeated Furman 76-70 Wednesday in the first round of the National Invitation Tournament. Markis McDuffie had 20 points, and Jaime Echenique had 16 points ...
No. 24 Wofford aims for perfect SoCon run at Samford (3/1/2019 3:06:00 PM) Hoover hit a 3-point shot to reach the milestone. Samford (16-14, 6-11) has lost three games in a row, including Thursday night's 90-81 home setback to Furman. Some of the recent high-scoring games against Samford tend to be disturbing. Earlier this winter ...
Jordan Lyons carries Furman past Samford in men's basketball (3/1/2019 12:11:00 PM) Jordan Lyons scored 17 points as Furman defeated Samford 90-81 on Thursday night. (Photo: EDDIE BURCH) HOMEWOOD, Ala. – Jordan Lyons scored 17 points as Furman defeated Samford 90-81 on Thursday night. Alex Hunter, Clay Mounce and Matt Rafferty added 15 ...
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.