Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 Furman23-10 (0.697) | Southern
All-Play Percentage: 0.743 (91st)
Schedule Strength: 0.419 (259th)
Record Quality: 0.140 (107th)
Avg. Season Rank: 95.94 (94th)
Pace: 70.69 (140th)
Momentum: 0.74 (137th)
Off. Momentum: 0.30 (169th)
Def. Momentum: 0.44 (117th)
Consistency: -9.17 (195th)
Res. Consistency: -14.27 (314th)
Away From Home: 0.58 (71st)
Paper Tiger Factor: -4.27 (341st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
106.50
70.59
22.93
69.98
85.38
38.54
45.14
37.60
13.36
35.54
19.28
7.63
39.56
28.50
17.55
61.58
14.78
12.81
5.23
44.04
22.58
33.38
2.11
RANK:
93rd
149th
290th
247th
35th
72nd
126th
14th
29th
149th
275th
234th
68th
171st
135th
106th
9th
256th
285th
32nd
300th
225th
304th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
97.92
70.80
24.12
--
80.18
36.30
45.27
27.23
8.44
30.99
23.01
8.48
36.86
29.94
19.38
64.73
9.51
13.13
7.12
33.96
28.70
37.34
1.97
RANK:
87th
216th
93rd
--
99th
165th
200th
42nd
12th
10th
202nd
187th
160th
220th
281st
300th
55th
68th
203rd
57th
233rd
255th
291st
ANALYSIS: They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Furman, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. They are ranked #91 (out of 351) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 23-10. Of the 10 schools in the Southern (average ranking 208.7), they're currently ranked as the best team in the conference.
Furman has a fairly effective defensive attack. Occupying the #87 slot in our defensive efficiency ratings, they will allow about 98 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Furman thrives on scoring fast and easy points off of steals. They're ranked ninth in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 14.78. Furman also does an outstanding job shutting down the opposition from behind the arc. They rank tenth in the NCAA in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make just 31.0% of their attempts from afar.
Furman plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 93rd nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 107 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Furman will make a concerted effort to fire off quite a few three-pointers each game. The team ranks 32nd in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. When it comes to actually making their three-point attempts, the squad shoots a so-so 35.5% from beyond the arc vs. AO. Furman also has one of the better squads in the college game when it comes to maximizing opportunities to score. The team is ranked 35th in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 85.38 vs. AO. As far as making those field goal attempts goes, the team is somewhat middle-of-the-road, converting about 45.1% of them vs. AO.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that are typically efficient on offense, Furman often performs worse than normal. Furman is more efficient than usual 36% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 95.37. In their other contests, Furman performs better than the norm 89% of the time.
Furman does better vs. clubs that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. When playing squads that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 45.14%, Furman performs above average 70% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 18% of the time.
Furman performs better against squads that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When facing teams that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 58.74%, Furman is more efficient than normal 64% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 22% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.