Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Miss. Valley St.1-30 (0.032) | SWAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.000 (362nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.364 (247th)
Record Quality: -0.620 (362nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 361.76 (362nd)
Pace: 66.01 (300th)
Momentum: 6.35 (14th)
Off. Momentum: 2.74 (47th)
Def. Momentum: 3.61 (16th)
Consistency: -10.06 (282nd)
Res. Consistency: -12.60 (213th)
Away From Home: -0.68 (242nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.92 (342nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
85.53
65.69
22.23
66.12
81.54
31.86
39.08
23.70
7.10
29.96
28.87
9.78
33.86
28.97
14.98
51.73
10.95
13.88
5.26
29.07
35.41
35.52
1.94
RANK:
361st
313th
328th
338th
338th
359th
352nd
351st
354th
344th
49th
118th
343rd
255th
311th
341st
209th
156th
193rd
348th
25th
207th
48th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
117.54
66.34
31.80
--
84.35
41.09
48.72
33.16
12.54
37.83
19.33
7.82
40.44
31.86
20.73
65.08
17.62
15.34
7.07
39.31
22.92
37.77
2.02
RANK:
358th
78th
340th
--
114th
337th
358th
258th
329th
345th
38th
64th
258th
222nd
324th
358th
360th
312th
344th
284th
39th
244th
160th
ANALYSIS: As one of the worst teams in NCAA basketball, Miss. Valley St. should be a pushover for the average-to-good squads in Division I. They are ranked #362 (out of 362) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 1-30. Of the 12 schools in the SWAC (average ranking 319.3), they're obviously ranked as the worst team in the conference.
Miss. Valley St. has a very tough time coming by points on offense. Scoring about 86 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are woefully ranked #361 in offensive efficiency. Miss. Valley St. tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 17.62, which ranks third from the bottom in D1. Miss. Valley St. is also downright awful shooting the basketball and can't hit from anywhere, shamefully ranking in the bottom-25 in each of the four major field goal shooting categories. They make just 30.0% of their three-pointers (ranking 344th nationally), 33.9% of their mid-range attempts (343rd), 51.7% of their near-proximity chances (341st), and 39.1% of their total shots from the field (352nd) vs. AO. Miss. Valley St. lastly has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 66.1% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #338 overall in free throw percentage.
Sadly, Miss. Valley St. is almost as horrific on the defensive end of the floor as they are on the offensive end of it. Allowing roughly 118 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #358 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Miss. Valley St. allows the opposition far too many easy shots from the floor and ranks in the bottom-25 in three of our four major defensive field goal shooting categories. AO will convert a healthy 37.8% of their three-pointers (345th in the nation), 65.1% of their near-proximity attempts (fifth from the bottom), and 48.7% of their total shots from the field (fifth from the bottom). Miss. Valley St. is also one of the very worst teams in the game when it comes to preventing opponents from scoring off of offensive rebounds. The team allows AO to convert 7.1% of all second-chance opportunities (344th nationally). Miss. Valley St. lastly fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 31.80 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #340 in the country in that category.
Miss. Valley St. has been playing much better basketball as of late and is presently ranked 14th in positive momentum because of it.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Miss. Valley St. performs better against squads that aren't terribly skilled defensively. When facing teams that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 106.25, Miss. Valley St. is more efficient than normal 81% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 27% of the time.
When playing teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint, Miss. Valley St. usually performs better than average. Miss. Valley St. is more efficient than normal 89% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 62.13%. In all other contests, Miss. Valley St. performs better than average 41% of the time.
Miss. Valley St. is typically better vs. teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. Against foes that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 46.27%, Miss. Valley St. performs above their norm 89% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 41% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.