TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Miss. Valley St.  1-30 (0.032)  |  SWAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.000 (362nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.364 (247th)
Record Quality: -0.620 (362nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 361.76 (362nd)
Pace: 66.01 (300th)
Momentum: 6.35 (14th)
Off. Momentum: 2.74 (47th)
Def. Momentum: 3.61 (16th)
Consistency: -10.06 (282nd)
Res. Consistency: -12.60 (213th)
Away From Home: -0.68 (242nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.92 (342nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 85.53 22.23 66.12 81.54 39.08 23.70 29.96 28.87 33.86 28.97 51.73 10.95 13.88 5.26 29.07 35.41 35.52 1.94
RANK: 361st 328th 338th 338th 352nd 351st 344th 49th 343rd 255th 341st 209th 156th 193rd 348th 25th 207th 48th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 117.54 31.80 -- 84.35 48.72 33.16 37.83 19.33 40.44 31.86 65.08 17.62 15.34 7.07 39.31 22.92 37.77 2.02
RANK: 358th 340th -- 114th 358th 258th 345th 38th 258th 222nd 358th 360th 312th 344th 284th 39th 244th 160th

ANALYSIS:
As one of the worst teams in NCAA basketball, Miss. Valley St. should be a pushover for the average-to-good squads in Division I. They are ranked #362 (out of 362) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 1-30. Of the 12 schools in the SWAC (average ranking 319.3), they're obviously ranked as the worst team in the conference.

Miss. Valley St. has a very tough time coming by points on offense. Scoring about 86 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are woefully ranked #361 in offensive efficiency. Miss. Valley St. tends to be very careless with the ball and allows far too many breakaway opportunities off of their own turnovers. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 17.62, which ranks third from the bottom in D1. Miss. Valley St. is also downright awful shooting the basketball and can't hit from anywhere, shamefully ranking in the bottom-25 in each of the four major field goal shooting categories. They make just 30.0% of their three-pointers (ranking 344th nationally), 33.9% of their mid-range attempts (343rd), 51.7% of their near-proximity chances (341st), and 39.1% of their total shots from the field (352nd) vs. AO. Miss. Valley St. lastly has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 66.1% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #338 overall in free throw percentage.

Sadly, Miss. Valley St. is almost as horrific on the defensive end of the floor as they are on the offensive end of it. Allowing roughly 118 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #358 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Miss. Valley St. allows the opposition far too many easy shots from the floor and ranks in the bottom-25 in three of our four major defensive field goal shooting categories. AO will convert a healthy 37.8% of their three-pointers (345th in the nation), 65.1% of their near-proximity attempts (fifth from the bottom), and 48.7% of their total shots from the field (fifth from the bottom). Miss. Valley St. is also one of the very worst teams in the game when it comes to preventing opponents from scoring off of offensive rebounds. The team allows AO to convert 7.1% of all second-chance opportunities (344th nationally). Miss. Valley St. lastly fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 31.80 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #340 in the country in that category.

Miss. Valley St. has been playing much better basketball as of late and is presently ranked 14th in positive momentum because of it.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Miss. Valley St. performs better against squads that aren't terribly skilled defensively. When facing teams that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 106.25, Miss. Valley St. is more efficient than normal 81% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 27% of the time.
When playing teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint, Miss. Valley St. usually performs better than average. Miss. Valley St. is more efficient than normal 89% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 62.13%. In all other contests, Miss. Valley St. performs better than average 41% of the time.
Miss. Valley St. is typically better vs. teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. Against foes that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 46.27%, Miss. Valley St. performs above their norm 89% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 41% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox