TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Miami  10-17 (0.370)  |  ACC
All-Play Percentage: 0.596 (144th)
Schedule Strength: 0.704 (68th)
Record Quality: 0.008 (168th)
Avg. Season Rank: 117.95 (116th)
Pace: 69.71 (184th)
Momentum: 3.47 (38th)
Off. Momentum: 3.44 (16th)
Def. Momentum: 0.03 (141st)
Consistency: -9.52 (209th)
Res. Consistency: -13.93 (257th)
Away From Home: 0.73 (117th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.53 (32nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 98.77 28.32 70.43 80.01 44.25 26.33 30.47 24.32 37.38 29.37 62.29 11.14 12.81 4.63 32.90 30.39 36.70 1.96
RANK: 186th 45th 200th 255th 141st 315th 317th 135th 206th 109th 75th 165th 178th 197th 297th 114th 89th 54th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 97.51 17.31 -- 85.04 43.07 32.75 36.76 23.12 36.60 29.17 55.30 11.13 13.37 3.73 38.51 27.19 34.30 2.04
RANK: 121st 3rd -- 307th 135th 267th 314th 175th 122nd 218th 65th 180th 224th 42nd 230th 139th 180th 152nd

ANALYSIS:
Per this website's calculations, Miami is somewhere between an average to slightly above-average D1 ball-club. They have a record of 10-17 and are ranked 144th overall (out of 357) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 15 schools in the ACC (average ranking 71.7), they're currently ranked as our #13 team in the conference.

Based on their performances this year, Miami will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 98 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #121 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. Miami is a superior unit when it comes to preventing opponents from getting to the foul line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 17.31 vs. AO, they are currently rated third in the country in that category. Miami is also one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 3.7% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 42nd in the NCAA). If Miami does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's inability to stop opponents from sinking threes. AO will convert 36.8% of their three-point attempts, and the team ranks 44th-worst in that category because of it.

Miami doesn't perform as well offensively as they do defensively. The team is ranked 186th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 99 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Miami won't enter the conversation if you're looking to list the best three-point shooting teams in the country. They are ranked 317th in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 30.5% of their attempts from long vs. AO. If Miami does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to get to the free throw line. The squad has a free throw attempt rate of 28.32 vs. AO, which ranks 45th in the country.

Miami has been playing better basketball in their most recent outings, as evidenced by the team's #38 ranking in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Miami performs worse against squads that aren't terribly skilled defensively. When facing teams that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 96.26, Miami is more efficient than normal 11% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 72% of the time.
When playing teams that favor a faster tempo, Miami usually performs worse than average. Miami is more efficient than normal 29% of the time when facing clubs that have a pace vs. AO greater than 67.99. In all other contests, Miami performs better than average 90% of the time.
Miami is typically better vs. teams that tend to get off more shots. Against foes that have an offensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 81.39, Miami performs above their norm 68% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 13% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Tech Advances to ACC Semifinals – Men's Basketball — Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets - Georgia Tech Official Athletic Site
(3/11/2021 5:52:27 PM) Tech Advances to ACC Semifinals – Men's Basketball — Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets  Georgia Tech Official Athletic Site
Tech Opens ACC Tournament Against Miami – Men's Basketball — Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets - Georgia Tech Official Athletic Site
(3/10/2021 6:50:55 PM) Tech Opens ACC Tournament Against Miami – Men's Basketball — Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets  Georgia Tech Official Athletic Site
Boston College men locked into last in ACC after comeback fails at Miami
(3/5/2021 9:04:52 PM) The Eagles erased a 9-point lead late in the second half, but promptly surrendered a 9-0 run to drop their 15th game out of 19.
McGusty scores 27, rallies Miami over Boston College 80-76
(3/5/2021 8:46:03 PM) CORAL GABLES, Fla. - Kameron McGusty scored a season-high 27 points and led a late rally as Miami defeated Boston College 80-76 on Friday in a regular...
No. 16 Virginia Tech escapes with overtime win in Miami - WSLS 10
(2/6/2021 5:57:00 PM) Hunter Cattoor had 14 points including they game-tying 3-pointer at the buzzer to force overtime.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox