Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Clemson 17-16 (0.515) | ACC

All-Play Percentage: 0.815 (67^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.646 (60^th)	Record Quality: 0.157 (95^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 60.46 (56^th)
Pace: 68.07 (219^th)	Momentum: 1.44 (111^th)	Off. Momentum: -0.43 (226^th)	Def. Momentum: 1.87 (54^th)
Consistency: -8.39 (90^th)	Res. Consistency: -10.99 (115^th)	Away From Home: 0.35 (146^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -1.55 (241^st)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

108.20

26.03

73.66

83.94

46.36

30.48

36.72

25.09

41.64

28.37

60.90

11.33

11.82

5.55

36.31

29.88

33.80

2.03

RANK:

49^th

84^th

119^th

156^th

52^nd

213^th

38^th

119^th

34^th

194^th

107^th

157^th

248^th

103^rd

216^th

122^nd

206^th

171^st

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

97.27

22.69

82.01

41.38

35.59

33.56

22.75

36.86

23.67

57.46

8.51

9.76

4.03

43.40

27.73

28.87

2.15

RANK:

115^th

125^th

102^nd

80^th

332^nd

164^th

160^th

137^th

16^th

127^th

16^th

13^th

80^th

344^th

174^th

16^th

12^th

ANALYSIS:
Despite what their win percentage might indicate, Clemson is a good team that can cause more than enough trouble for most opponents. They are ranked #67 (out of 358) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 17-16. Of the 15 schools in the ACC (average ranking 82.1), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference.

The primary strength for Clemson this year is offense. The team is ranked 49th in efficiency on that end of the floor, and they'll rack up more than 108 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Clemson allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.51, which ranks #16 in the country. Clemson also has a keen ability to drain field goals between the three-point line and the low post. The squad is ranked 34th nationally in mid-range field goal percentage, making about 41.6% of their attempts from those locations vs. AO.

Clemson is also a fairly decent team on the defensive end of the court. The team ranks 115th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 97 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Clemson does a super job to deny opponents offensive rebounds and second chances. They have a rating of 9.76 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked 13th in the country).

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Tue 11/9/2021	vs Presbyterian₂₅₆	W 74.22 - 57.00	W 64-53	1-0	108.58	97.33	▼ 11.25	88.83	77.67	▲ 11.16	▼ 0.09
Fri 11/12/2021	vs Wofford₁₁₆	W 72.64 - 63.87	W 76-68	2-0	106.92	107.08	▲ 0.16	98.95	98.45	▲ 0.50	▲ 0.66
Mon 11/15/2021	vs Bryant₂₀₆	W 83.36 - 68.13	W 93-70	3-0	110.82	136.67	▲ 25.85	95.59	104.28	▼ 8.69	▲ 17.16
Thu 11/18/2021	vs Temple₁₁₄ *	W 69.98 - 64.79	W 75-48	4-0	102.00	116.36	▲ 14.36	94.30	75.93	▲ 18.37	▲ 32.73
Fri 11/19/2021	vs St. Bonaventure₈₀ *	W 69.88 - 68.89	L 65-68	4-1	103.96	101.56	▼ 2.40	101.76	107.94	▼ 6.18	▼ 8.58
Sun 11/21/2021	vs West Virginia₆₄ *	L 70.32 - 70.55	L 59-66	4-2	100.70	89.06	▼ 11.64	101.59	98.51	▲ 3.08	▼ 8.56
Fri 11/26/2021	vs Charleston So.₃₄₁	W 84.28 - 58.25	W 91-59	5-2	116.40	134.64	▲ 18.24	84.85	75.75	▲ 9.10	▲ 27.34
Tue 11/30/2021	@ Rutgers₇₃	L 65.89 - 69.11	L 64-74	5-3	100.47	98.91	▼ 1.56	99.04	105.88	▼ 6.84	▼ 8.40
Sat 12/4/2021	@ Miami₅₁	L 70.48 - 75.56	L 75-80	5-4	103.90	112.56	▲ 8.66	105.92	112.85	▼ 6.93	▲ 1.73
Sat 12/11/2021	vs Drake₇₁ *	W 70.41 - 70.03	W 90-80 (OT)	6-4	103.57	116.54	▲ 12.97	102.62	113.85	▼ 11.23	▲ 1.74
Tue 12/14/2021	vs Miami (OH)₂₅₉	W 82.32 - 64.12	W 89-76	7-4	116.64	133.27	▲ 16.63	95.63	118.30	▼ 22.67	▼ 6.04
Sat 12/18/2021	vs South Carolina₁₀₂	W 74.38 - 66.90	W 70-56	8-4	100.40	96.97	▼ 3.43	95.22	82.67	▲ 12.55	▲ 9.12
Wed 12/22/2021	@ Virginia₇₈	L 61.58 - 64.20	W 67-50	9-4	101.29	107.67	▲ 6.38	99.90	74.38	▲ 25.52	▲ 31.90
Tue 1/4/2022	vs Virginia₇₈	W 64.88 - 60.89	L 65-75	9-5	101.29	102.17	▲ 0.88	99.90	123.64	▼ 23.74	▼ 22.86
Sat 1/8/2022	@ NC State₁₁₇	W 73.74 - 71.85	W 70-65	10-5	109.54	101.26	▼ 8.28	101.55	86.37	▲ 15.18	▲ 6.90
Wed 1/12/2022	@ Notre Dame₅₃	L 67.53 - 72.26	L 56-72	10-6	102.76	89.77	▼ 12.99	104.71	108.62	▼ 3.91	▼ 16.90
Sat 1/15/2022	vs Boston College₁₂₂	W 71.89 - 63.00	L 68-70	10-7	105.11	94.47	▼ 10.64	96.91	104.12	▼ 7.21	▼ 17.85
Tue 1/18/2022	@ Syracuse₆₅	L 72.24 - 76.06	L 78-91	10-8	106.90	109.62	▲ 2.72	107.25	121.27	▼ 14.02	▼ 11.30
Sat 1/22/2022	vs Pittsburgh₁₉₇	W 73.04 - 59.63	W 75-48	11-8	107.01	114.87	▲ 7.86	92.65	79.46	▲ 13.19	▲ 21.05
Tue 1/25/2022	@ Duke₁₀	L 67.23 - 80.32	L 69-71	11-9	99.79	105.66	▲ 5.87	113.03	103.30	▲ 9.73	▲ 15.60
Wed 2/2/2022	vs Florida State₁₂₄	W 75.28 - 65.94	W 75-69	12-9	106.15	107.62	▲ 1.47	97.69	104.14	▼ 6.45	▼ 4.98
Sat 2/5/2022	@ Georgia Tech₁₅₅	W 71.55 - 67.10	L 64-69	12-10	105.33	93.78	▼ 11.55	93.74	95.90	▼ 2.16	▼ 13.71
Tue 2/8/2022	vs North Carolina₁₅	L 71.40 - 75.22	L 77-79	12-11	98.11	104.27	▲ 6.16	109.08	118.85	▼ 9.77	▼ 3.61
Thu 2/10/2022	vs Duke₁₀	L 70.88 - 76.64	L 64-82	12-12	99.79	85.02	▼ 14.77	113.03	122.67	▼ 9.64	▼ 24.41
Sat 2/12/2022	vs Notre Dame₅₃	W 71.08 - 68.70	L 61-76	12-13	102.76	92.49	▼ 10.27	104.71	123.64	▼ 18.93	▼ 29.20
Tue 2/15/2022	@ Florida State₁₂₄	W 71.63 - 69.53	L 80-81	12-14	106.15	113.78	▲ 7.63	97.69	111.41	▼ 13.72	▼ 6.09
Sat 2/19/2022	@ Louisville₁₂₀	W 70.07 - 68.08	L 61-70	12-15	103.94	93.72	▼ 10.22	96.03	105.02	▼ 8.99	▼ 19.21
Wed 2/23/2022	vs Wake Forest₃₄	W 73.59 - 72.73	W 80-69	13-15	100.41	114.98	▲ 14.57	104.39	105.66	▼ 1.27	▲ 13.30
Sat 2/26/2022	@ Boston College₁₂₂	W 68.37 - 66.44	W 70-60	14-15	105.11	112.05	▲ 6.94	96.91	92.19	▲ 4.72	▲ 11.66
Wed 3/2/2022	vs Georgia Tech₁₅₅	W 75.22 - 63.52	W 68-65	15-15	105.33	98.82	▼ 6.51	93.74	98.26	▼ 4.52	▼ 11.03
Sat 3/5/2022	vs Virginia Tech₂₄	L 67.26 - 67.85	W 63-59	16-15	100.21	100.61	▲ 0.40	106.20	94.86	▲ 11.34	▲ 11.74
Tue 3/8/2022	vs NC State₁₁₇ *	W 75.56 - 70.05	W 70-64	17-15	109.54	98.59	▼ 10.95	101.55	90.14	▲ 11.41	▲ 0.46
Wed 3/9/2022	vs Virginia Tech₂₄ *	L 65.54 - 69.59	L 75-76 (OT)	17-16	100.21	108.20	▲ 7.99	106.20	108.20	▼ 2.00	▲ 5.99
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Clemson does worse vs. clubs that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When playing squads that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 58.95%, Clemson performs above average 33% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 75% of the time.
	Clemson performs better against squads that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. When facing teams that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.08%, Clemson is more efficient than normal 61% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 20% of the time.
	When playing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, Clemson usually performs worse than average. Clemson is more efficient than normal 35% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.03. In all other contests, Clemson performs better than average 69% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Clemson rematch next for bubble team Virginia Tech - Roanoke Times (3/8/2022 7:00:00 PM) Clemson rematch next for bubble team Virginia Tech Roanoke Times
	Mediocre seasons mean Virginia and Virginia Tech need deep ACC tournament runs - The Washington Post (3/8/2022 2:30:50 PM) The No. 6 Cavaliers and seventh-seeded Hokies open at Barclays Center in Wednesday night's second round and have the potential of meeting in the semifinals.
	Georgia Tech Survives Washington's Record-Setting Performance – Clemson Tigers Official Athletics Site - clemsontigers.com (2/13/2022 2:33:28 PM) Atlanta, Ga. – Delicia Washington scored a career-high 40 points, but Georgia Tech outscored the Tigers 15-7 in overtime to survive against the Tigers, 92-84. The win moves the 11-ranked Yellow Jackets to 19-6, 10-4 ACC, on the year, while the loss drops the …
	Coach K's farewell tour: Duke survives Clemson's upset bid to keep Mike Krzyzewski's final season on track (1/25/2022 9:55:39 PM) The Blue Devils were pushed to the limit by Clemson on Tuesday but survived in a thriller
	Banchero keys late run for No. 9 Duke, beats Clemson 71-69 (1/25/2022 9:15:13 PM) DURHAM, N.C. (AP) — Paolo Banchero scored 19 points as ninth-ranked Duke pulled away late from Clemson for a 71-69 win Tuesday night.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox