TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 UMES  18-13 (0.581)  |  MEAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.196 (292nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.329 (296th)
Record Quality: -0.059 (210th)
Avg. Season Rank: 295.88 (300th)
Pace: 69.48 (83rd)
Momentum: 0.52 (147th)
Off. Momentum: -3.06 (348th)
Def. Momentum: 3.58 (7th)
Consistency: -9.40 (212th)
Res. Consistency: -11.54 (141st)
Away From Home: -0.51 (168th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.28 (327th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 91.42 22.75 71.56 81.02 40.38 30.42 31.92 20.73 35.02 29.87 52.72 16.03 12.06 3.87 37.54 25.59 36.87 2.01
RANK: 350th 297th 188th 332nd 331st 217th 296th 284th 308th 155th 340th 9th 276th 324th 154th 261st 106th 149th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 101.80 26.62 -- 80.92 44.94 30.72 32.97 21.86 41.64 28.35 60.45 12.43 16.98 6.10 37.96 27.01 35.03 2.03
RANK: 147th 242nd -- 47th 234th 168th 122nd 101st 330th 130th 238th 304th 342nd 288th 234th 143rd 178th 155th

ANALYSIS:
Despite having a win percentage north of .500, UMES is definitely a below-average ball-club in college hoops this year. They have a record of 18-13 and are ranked 292nd overall (out of 363) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the eight schools in the MEAC (average ranking 290.6), they're currently ranked as our #4 team in the conference.

Based on their performances this year, UMES will likely find more success on defense than they will on offense. Allowing about 102 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #147 slot in the ratings for defensive efficiency. UMES thrives on scoring fast and easy points off of steals. They're ranked ninth in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 16.03. UMES also does a really good job to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 47th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 80.92 vs. AO. If UMES does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's difficulties stopping opponents from obtaining second-chance opportunities via offensive rebounds. The squad has a rating of 16.98 in potential points allowed off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 22nd-worst in college hoops.

Unfortunately, UMES is not even remotely close to being as good on offense as they are on defense. The team is ranked 350th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 91 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. UMES will have a really tough time winning games when taking into consideration their shooting percentage near the basket. The team is ranked 340th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 52.7% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. Moreover, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting just 40.4% of their total attempts vs. AO. UMES is also one of the more inferior teams in the college game when it comes to maximizing opportunities to score on offense. The team is nationally ranked 332nd in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 81.02 vs. AO.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
UMES performs better against squads that favor a faster tempo. When facing teams that have a pace vs. AO greater than 69.66, UMES is more efficient than normal 88% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 21% of the time.
When playing teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass, UMES usually performs better than average. UMES is more efficient than normal 88% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.80%. In all other contests, UMES performs better than average 21% of the time.
UMES is typically worse vs. teams that are typically efficient on offense. Against foes that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 99.17, UMES performs above their norm 15% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 64% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox