TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 McNeese  15-16 (0.484)  |  Southland
All-Play Percentage: 0.154 (296th)
Schedule Strength: 0.375 (308th)
Record Quality: -0.192 (275th)
Avg. Season Rank: 270.97 (276th)
Pace: 63.98 (279th)
Momentum: -1.97 (271st)
Off. Momentum: 1.23 (132nd)
Def. Momentum: -3.19 (301st)
Consistency: -10.72 (315th)
Res. Consistency: -12.55 (237th)
Away From Home: 1.26 (46th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.14 (25th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 95.81 25.13 64.55 89.10 39.35 30.75 30.79 24.98 33.09 33.37 51.93 12.43 20.47 8.15 34.51 28.04 37.45 1.97
RANK: 251st 308th 312th 3rd 311th 74th 320th 188th 274th 15th 322nd 106th 11th 45th 167th 265th 72nd 127th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 108.83 28.58 -- 85.33 45.92 30.01 34.42 20.53 38.12 34.79 60.44 10.20 17.75 8.48 35.16 24.06 40.77 1.94
RANK: 318th 161st -- 309th 283rd 270th 158th 21st 272nd 340th 218th 79th 313th 312th 221st 4th 326th 275th

ANALYSIS:
Not one of the better ball-clubs in college basketball, McNeese should be a fairly easy win for most capable opponents. Their record this season is 15-16, and the club is ranked 296th overall (out of 351) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. Of the 13 schools in the Southland (average ranking 267.4), they're currently ranked as our #7 team in the conference.

McNeese does not provide much of a challenge on defense. They are ranked at #318 in efficiency on that end of the court and give up about 109 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. McNeese can be weak on rebounding, giving the opposition too many chances to score off of the offensive glass. The club has a rating of 17.75 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (313th nationally), and they let AO convert a healthy 8.5% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 312th) as well. McNeese also struggles on occasion to deny opponents opportunities to shoot from the floor. The team is ranked 309th in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 85.33 vs. AO.

Though they rate better on offense than they do on defense, McNeese still isn't one of the more capable offensive teams in college hoops. Scoring roughly 96 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #251 in the nation in offensive efficiency. McNeese struggles to drain shots consistently from most spots on the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four primary field goal shooting categories. They only convert 30.8% of their three-pointers (320th in the nation), 51.9% of their near-proximity attempts (322nd), and 39.4% of their total shots from the field (311th) vs. AO. McNeese is also not one of the better teams when it comes to sinking foul shots. Converting just 64.5% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #312 overall in free throw percentage. If McNeese does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to successfully get off shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of 89.10 vs. AO, which ranks #3 in college basketball.

McNeese has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 315th in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most. On the road, McNeese performs somewhat better than their norm, as the squad is nationally ranked 46th in our away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
McNeese performs better against squads that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 60.65%, McNeese is more efficient than normal 88% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 21% of the time.
When playing teams that do not defend well on the perimeter, McNeese usually performs worse than average. McNeese is more efficient than normal 15% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.16%. In all other contests, McNeese performs better than average 64% of the time.
McNeese is typically worse vs. teams that allow more chances at the line. Against foes that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 32.63, McNeese performs above their norm 10% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 59% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox