TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 Manhattan  10-22 (0.313)  |  MAAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.169 (292nd)
Schedule Strength: 0.457 (207th)
Record Quality: -0.214 (272nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 278.49 (283rd)
Pace: 71.72 (85th)
Momentum: -1.05 (218th)
Off. Momentum: 1.23 (137th)
Def. Momentum: -2.28 (274th)
Consistency: -8.67 (144th)
Res. Consistency: -11.35 (172nd)
Away From Home: -1.66 (308th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.25 (201st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 92.70 27.48 73.14 76.93 40.91 28.64 33.76 21.82 38.02 26.47 51.01 10.56 11.76 4.40 37.23 28.36 34.41 2.03
RANK: 313th 172nd 90th 342nd 301st 208th 239th 227th 97th 260th 338th 178th 307th 334th 145th 188th 189th 203rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.14 36.78 -- 75.02 46.99 23.28 40.50 24.30 38.32 27.44 60.17 10.17 13.89 7.02 31.03 32.39 36.58 1.94
RANK: 245th 349th -- 7th 282nd 6th 345th 201st 249th 136th 177th 122nd 135th 212th 22nd 291st 240th 308th

ANALYSIS:
Not one of the better ball-clubs in college basketball, Manhattan should be a fairly easy win for most capable opponents. Their record this season is 10-22, and the club is ranked 292nd overall (out of 351) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #10 team (out of 11) in the MAAC (average ranking 203.1).

Manhattan is not one of the most productive teams on offense. Scoring fewer than 93 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are rated at #313 in offensive efficiency. Manhattan happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked tenth from the bottom in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 76.93 vs. AO. Manhattan will also have a really tough time winning games when taking into consideration their shooting percentage near the basket. The team is ranked 338th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 51.0% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. Manhattan lastly does a terrible job to take advantage of scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 4.4% of all second-chance opportunities (334th nationally), and with a rating of 11.76, they're 307th in potential points scored off of the offensive boards as well.

Though they rate better on defense than they do on offense, Manhattan still isn't one of the more capable defensive teams in college hoops. Allowing roughly 106 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #245 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Manhattan fouls far too much and sends the opposition to the line way too often. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 36.78 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #349 in the country in that category. Manhattan also does an extremely poor job to deny the opposition behind the arc. They rank seventh from the bottom nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 40.5% of their attempts from afar. Luckily, AO will take nowhere near as many threes as they typically would, and only 31.0% of AO's field goal attempts will come from downtown. If Manhattan does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to limit the number of shot attempts by the opposition. The team has a defensive field goal attempt rate of 75.02 vs. AO, which ranks seventh-best in college basketball.

When playing on the road, Manhattan performs somewhat worse than they normally do on their home court. The club is nationally ranked 308th in our site's away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Manhattan is typically better vs. teams that do not defend well on the perimeter. Against foes that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.90%, Manhattan performs above their norm 68% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 20% of the time.
When facing teams that shoot the ball well from the field, Manhattan often performs worse than normal. Manhattan is more efficient than usual 27% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.28%. In their other contests, Manhattan performs better than the norm 67% of the time.
Manhattan does worse vs. clubs that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When playing squads that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 56.44%, Manhattan performs above average 41% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 80% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox