Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 Pittsburgh8-24 (0.250) | ACC
All-Play Percentage: 0.309 (243rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.701 (44th)
Record Quality: -0.149 (249th)
Avg. Season Rank: 226.82 (222nd)
Pace: 67.46 (313th)
Momentum: -2.36 (286th)
Off. Momentum: -0.32 (217th)
Def. Momentum: -2.04 (259th)
Consistency: -8.79 (146th)
Res. Consistency: -14.76 (328th)
Away From Home: -0.20 (155th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -3.75 (328th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
95.65
67.40
24.18
70.90
77.73
33.36
42.92
35.24
11.79
33.45
16.64
5.94
35.68
25.85
15.63
60.47
7.63
9.94
4.99
45.34
21.41
33.25
2.12
RANK:
278th
317th
248th
206th
332nd
307th
229th
46th
100th
262nd
336th
334th
235th
283rd
249th
146th
329th
339th
300th
18th
319th
231st
313th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
103.93
67.52
25.67
--
85.77
37.06
43.20
33.85
11.36
33.55
20.55
7.61
37.04
31.37
18.09
57.65
11.14
17.47
6.74
39.46
23.96
36.57
2.03
RANK:
193rd
39th
154th
--
322nd
206th
118th
307th
225th
73rd
96th
92nd
167th
281st
218th
89th
200th
330th
164th
263rd
53rd
228th
151st
ANALYSIS: If you see Pittsburgh on the schedule, you will likely get one of the average to below-average teams in college hoops. They have a record of 8-24 and are ranked 243rd overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of 15) in the ACC (average ranking 55.7).
Pittsburgh is not one of the most productive teams on offense. Scoring fewer than 96 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are rated at #278 in offensive efficiency. Pittsburgh poses no threat whatsoever to grab rebounds off their own misses. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 9.94 in potential points scored off of second chances (339th nationally). Pittsburgh also happens to be one of the very worst in the game when it comes to maximizing the number of shot attempts they get off from the floor. The team is nationally ranked 332nd in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 77.73 vs. AO.
Though they rate better on defense than they do on offense, Pittsburgh still isn't one of the more capable defensive teams in college hoops. Allowing roughly 104 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #193 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Pittsburgh gives up far too many offensive rebounds and second chances to their opponents. The club has a rating of 17.47 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (330th nationally). Pittsburgh is also extremely underskilled to force steals that turn into quick and easy points. They're ranked #329 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 7.63 vs. AO.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that allow more chances at the line, Pittsburgh usually performs better than average. Pittsburgh is more efficient than normal 88% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 24.37. In all other contests, Pittsburgh performs better than average 20% of the time.
Pittsburgh is typically worse vs. teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint. Against foes that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 62.91%, Pittsburgh performs above their norm 25% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 75% of the time.
When facing teams that shoot the ball well from the field, Pittsburgh often performs worse than normal. Pittsburgh is more efficient than usual 29% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 46.06%. In their other contests, Pittsburgh performs better than the norm 78% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.