Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2018-19 Penn 19-12 (0.613) | Ivy

All-Play Percentage: 0.651 (124^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.534 (132^nd)	Record Quality: 0.134 (111^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 121.10 (123^rd)
Pace: 68.49 (190^th)	Momentum: 1.84 (86^th)	Off. Momentum: -2.34 (320^th)	Def. Momentum: 4.18 (8^th)
Consistency: -10.01 (240^th)	Res. Consistency: -12.32 (186^th)	Away From Home: 0.33 (128^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -1.39 (218^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2019. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

103.33

23.11

65.76

82.33

45.50

36.91

35.81

10.91

33.25

34.51

59.73

10.68

11.97

5.67

44.83

13.25

41.91

2.03

RANK:

162^nd

290^th

327^th

232^nd

103^rd

41^st

102^nd

352^nd

275^th

42^nd

173^rd

223^rd

275^th

206^th

29^th

352^nd

32^nd

189^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

99.72

22.59

85.99

43.60

26.30

33.56

24.69

35.78

35.00

56.67

12.36

15.07

5.66

30.58

28.72

40.70

1.90

RANK:

100^th

39^th

282^nd

139^th

7^th

112^th

314^th

160^th

326^th

77^th

242^nd

286^th

119^th

3^rd

305^th

315^th

345^th

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Penn, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. Carrying a record of 19-12, they are currently rated #124 overall (out of 353) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the #3 team (out of eight) in the Ivy League (average ranking 158.3).

Penn has a fairly effective defensive attack. Occupying the #100 slot in our defensive efficiency ratings, they will allow about 100 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Penn does a pretty solid job avoiding careless fouls and minimizing opponents' opportunities from the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 22.59 vs. AO, they are currently rated 39th in the country in that category.

Penn is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 162nd nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 103 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Penn will make a concerted effort to fire off quite a few three-pointers each game. The team ranks 29th in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. When it comes to actually making their three-point attempts, the squad shoots a so-so 35.8% from beyond the arc vs. AO. If Penn does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's poor shooting at the line. The squad makes just 65.8% of their free throw attempts, which ranks 27th-worst in Division I.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Tue 11/6/2018	@ George Mason₁₅₃	L 69.41 - 69.91	W 72-71	1-0	102.84	98.18	▼ 4.66	99.27	92.81	▲ 6.46	▲ 1.80
Fri 11/9/2018	vs Rice₂₄₁	W 78.49 - 66.33	W 92-76	2-0	107.95	106.15	▼ 1.80	96.56	103.83	▼ 7.27	▼ 9.07
Tue 11/13/2018	vs Lafayette₂₉₈	W 79.81 - 63.75	W 91-61	3-0	111.69	136.72	▲ 25.03	95.22	78.50	▲ 16.72	▲ 41.75
Fri 11/16/2018	vs Northern Iowa₁₈₄ *	W 67.78 - 63.00	W 78-71	4-0	102.62	119.40	▲ 16.78	96.49	101.47	▼ 4.98	▲ 11.80
Sun 11/18/2018	vs Kansas State₂₁ *	L 57.98 - 68.00	L 48-64	4-1	89.06	64.71	▼ 24.35	104.42	89.55	▲ 14.87	▼ 9.48
Mon 11/19/2018	vs Oregon State₉₂ *	L 68.22 - 70.40	L 58-74	4-2	103.06	85.14	▼ 17.92	106.98	114.29	▼ 7.31	▼ 25.23
Sat 11/24/2018	vs Richard Stockton	---	W 112-63	5-2	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Tue 11/27/2018	@ Delaware State₃₅₂	W 79.29 - 56.82	W 76-48	6-2	113.85	107.50	▼ 6.35	78.66	54.14	▲ 24.52	▲ 18.17
Tue 12/4/2018	vs Miami₆₈	L 69.12 - 69.33	W 89-75	7-2	100.75	124.37	▲ 23.62	105.87	116.13	▼ 10.26	▲ 13.36
Sat 12/8/2018	@ La Salle₂₂₃	W 71.03 - 67.31	W 83-65	8-2	104.09	119.68	▲ 15.59	95.65	82.99	▲ 12.66	▲ 28.25
Tue 12/11/2018	vs Villanova₃₈	L 65.44 - 69.85	W 78-75	9-2	99.42	108.30	▲ 8.88	111.52	120.50	▼ 8.98	▼ 0.10
Sat 12/22/2018	@ New Mexico₂₀₁	W 75.91 - 73.20	W 75-65	10-2	107.04	110.41	▲ 3.37	98.68	86.54	▲ 12.14	▲ 15.51
Sat 12/29/2018	@ Toledo₆₇	L 66.04 - 73.29	L 45-77	10-3	98.27	70.26	▼ 28.01	104.84	106.75	▼ 1.91	▼ 29.92
Mon 12/31/2018	vs Monmouth₃₀₂	W 73.88 - 58.39	L 74-76 (OT)	10-4	106.02	109.44	▲ 3.42	89.31	110.13	▼ 20.82	▼ 17.40
Sat 1/5/2019	@ Princeton₁₇₈	W 67.56 - 66.07	L 65-68 (OT)	10-5	100.69	95.03	▼ 5.66	94.85	91.44	▲ 3.41	▼ 2.25
Sat 1/12/2019	vs Princeton₁₇₈	W 70.83 - 62.66	L 53-62	10-6	100.69	72.69	▼ 28.00	94.85	91.72	▲ 3.13	▼ 24.87
Sat 1/19/2019	@ Temple₇₁	L 67.13 - 74.36	W 77-70	11-6	99.11	120.05	▲ 20.94	105.97	102.12	▲ 3.85	▲ 24.79
Sat 1/26/2019	vs Saint Joe's₁₆₅	W 75.10 - 67.66	W 78-70	12-6	107.16	115.24	▲ 8.08	101.20	104.69	▼ 3.49	▲ 4.59
Fri 2/1/2019	@ Cornell₂₁₀	W 70.16 - 66.92	L 71-80	12-7	104.07	95.92	▼ 8.15	96.02	101.40	▼ 5.38	▼ 13.53
Sat 2/2/2019	@ Columbia₂₁₉	W 71.31 - 68.03	W 72-70	13-7	106.11	108.38	▲ 2.27	97.73	100.45	▼ 2.72	▼ 0.45
Fri 2/8/2019	@ Brown₁₅₄	L 69.55 - 70.14	W 92-82	14-7	98.65	132.07	▲ 33.42	95.84	116.78	▼ 20.94	▲ 12.48
Sat 2/9/2019	@ Yale₆₄	L 69.84 - 77.83	L 65-78	14-8	99.46	95.25	▼ 4.21	106.59	113.92	▼ 7.33	▼ 11.54
Fri 2/15/2019	vs Dartmouth₂₀₆	W 73.95 - 64.36	W 82-79 (OT)	15-8	107.64	110.41	▲ 2.77	99.16	113.61	▼ 14.45	▼ 11.68
Sat 2/16/2019	vs Harvard₁₁₁	W 69.49 - 66.79	L 68-75 (OT)	15-9	99.57	87.21	▼ 12.36	101.33	89.64	▲ 11.69	▼ 0.67
Fri 2/22/2019	vs Columbia₂₁₉	W 74.59 - 64.70	L 77-79 (OT)	15-10	106.11	106.59	▲ 0.48	97.73	116.33	▼ 18.60	▼ 18.12
Sat 2/23/2019	vs Cornell₂₁₀	W 73.45 - 63.55	W 68-50	16-10	104.07	100.32	▼ 3.75	96.02	83.82	▲ 12.20	▲ 8.45
Fri 3/1/2019	@ Harvard₁₁₁	L 66.24 - 70.15	L 53-59	16-11	99.57	83.10	▼ 16.47	101.33	84.27	▲ 17.06	▲ 0.59
Sat 3/2/2019	@ Dartmouth₂₀₆	W 70.73 - 67.67	W 65-51	17-11	107.64	98.94	▼ 8.70	99.16	65.76	▲ 33.40	▲ 24.70
Fri 3/8/2019	vs Yale₆₄	L 73.26 - 74.26	W 77-66	18-11	99.46	115.97	▲ 16.51	106.59	102.50	▲ 4.09	▲ 20.60
Sat 3/9/2019	vs Brown₁₅₄	W 72.98 - 66.62	W 58-51	19-11	98.65	86.56	▼ 12.09	95.84	82.81	▲ 13.03	▲ 0.94
Sat 3/16/2019	vs Harvard₁₁₁ *	L 67.86 - 68.47	L 58-66	19-12	99.57	90.63	▼ 8.94	101.33	102.72	▼ 1.39	▼ 10.33
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Penn does better vs. clubs that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. When playing squads that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.43%, Penn performs above average 69% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 14% of the time.
	Penn performs better against squads that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When facing teams that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 59.71%, Penn is more efficient than normal 75% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 22% of the time.
	When playing teams that favor a faster tempo, Penn usually performs better than average. Penn is more efficient than normal 67% of the time when facing clubs that have a pace vs. AO greater than 68.57. In all other contests, Penn performs better than average 20% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Maryland men’s lacrosse survives scare to beat Penn in overtime, 13-12 (2/16/2019 3:33:00 PM) Despite Maryland going up 11-8, Penn came back with a three-goal run of their own to tie the game with 7:52 left in the game. Just five seconds later, Goldner gave the Quakers the lead ... GameThread: Maryland basketball vs. Michigan Follow along as ...
	Martin CBB Blog (Day 100): From Friday, February 15th (2/16/2019 10:33:00 AM) Penn (15-8, 3-4) def. Dartmouth (11-12, 2-5): 82-79 — OT -AJ Brodeur had 36 points and pulled in 11 rebounds in a monster performance for Penn. -Nick Perkins put in 26 points and grabbed 10 rebounds off the bench for Buffalo. Caelan Sanford had 24 and 10 ...
	Dartmouth, Princeton meet in conference play (2/16/2019 6:59:00 AM) Princeton lost 78-69 at home to Harvard, while Dartmouth came up short in an 82-79 overtime game at Penn. TEAM LEADERSHIP: Princeton’s Devin Cannady has averaged 18.7 points and 6.1 rebounds ...
	What to take away from Penn men's basketball's tight overtime win over Dartmouth (2/15/2019 11:29:00 PM) Credit: Future Kortor After a disappointing road trip last weekend, Penn men's basketball is starting to look like its ... the next six minutes completely flipped the game back in the Quakers' favor and saw the team take a 55-52 lead, one that did not ...
	Brodeur scores 36 to lead Penn past Dartmouth 82-79 in OT (2/15/2019 10:17:00 PM) The Quakers forced a turnover on ... Brendan Barry had seven assists. Penn plays Harvard at home on Saturday. Dartmouth plays Princeton on the road on Saturday. For more AP college basketball coverage: https://apnews.com/Collegebasketball and http ...

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox