Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Gardner-Webb 11-15 (0.423) | Big South

All-Play Percentage: 0.528 (170^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.410 (235^th)	Record Quality: -0.154 (251^st)	Avg. Season Rank: 198.17 (195^th)
Pace: 68.83 (230^th)	Momentum: 2.35 (74^th)	Off. Momentum: 1.22 (114^th)	Def. Momentum: 1.12 (77^th)
Consistency: -11.12 (324^th)	Res. Consistency: -10.80 (101^st)	Away From Home: -0.05 (196^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: 1.26 (45^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

100.33

23.64

68.57

81.94

43.65

34.57

36.38

18.91

37.41

28.47

56.63

9.32

12.29

5.26

42.18

23.07

34.74

2.07

RANK:

158^th

217^th

255^th

182^nd

171^st

60^th

67^th

300^th

205^th

161^st

239^th

274^th

210^th

132^nd

63^rd

305^th

158^th

253^rd

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

102.35

27.48

83.22

42.56

33.33

34.66

24.71

38.61

25.18

56.89

10.36

13.24

5.36

40.05

29.69

30.26

2.10

RANK:

221^st

278^th

219^th

108^th

290^th

219^th

251^st

186^th

59^th

104^th

116^th

217^th

223^rd

289^th

239^th

46^th

45^th

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Gardner-Webb, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. Ranked 170th overall (out of 357) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 11-15. Of the 11 schools in the Big South (average ranking 241.1), they're currently ranked as our #2 team in the conference.

Based on the data, Gardner-Webb will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 100 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #158 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. Gardner-Webb will likely shoot a fair share of three-pointers each contest. The team ranks 63rd in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. If you do allow them to shoot from long, they have the ability to punish you for it, too. Ranked in the top-75 in three-point shooting percentage, they make approximately 36.4% of their three-point attempts vs. AO.

Gardner-Webb doesn't perform as well defensively as they do offensively. The team is ranked 221st in defensive efficiency, allowing about 102 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Gardner-Webb has some difficulty staying out of foul trouble, leading to an excess of free throw attempts for the opposition. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 27.48 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #278 in the country in that category.

Gardner-Webb has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 324th in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Thu 12/10/2020	@ W. Kentucky₉₅	L 64.39 - 73.62	L 84-86	0-1	96.12	108.47	▲ 12.35	106.00	109.55	▼ 3.55	▲ 8.80
Sat 12/12/2020	@ Pittsburgh₉₀	L 65.70 - 75.12	L 50-67	0-2	96.91	60.50	▼ 36.41	106.99	85.63	▲ 21.36	▼ 15.05
Tue 12/15/2020	@ ETSU₁₃₄	L 63.90 - 68.89	L 60-65	0-3	98.52	86.99	▼ 11.53	102.92	95.98	▲ 6.94	▼ 4.59
Fri 12/18/2020	vs VMI₁₅₃	W 75.36 - 73.38	W 88-77	1-3	104.64	128.17	▲ 23.53	107.30	119.33	▼ 12.03	▲ 11.50
Mon 12/21/2020	@ Florida State₁₇	L 62.56 - 80.75	L 59-72	1-4	91.70	80.80	▼ 10.90	114.25	92.14	▲ 22.11	▲ 11.21
Wed 12/30/2020	@ Hampton₃₀₉	W 75.38 - 68.34	L 69-80	1-5	108.52	88.14	▼ 20.38	94.97	100.25	▼ 5.28	▼ 25.66
Thu 12/31/2020	@ Hampton₃₀₉	W 75.38 - 68.34	W 80-69	2-5	108.52	114.81	▲ 6.29	94.97	97.50	▼ 2.53	▲ 3.76
Mon 1/4/2021	vs Campbell₁₈₉	W 69.30 - 65.38	L 61-70	2-6	104.39	91.35	▼ 13.04	102.97	107.97	▼ 5.00	▼ 18.04
Tue 1/5/2021	vs Campbell₁₈₉	W 69.30 - 65.38	W 85-70	3-6	104.39	122.10	▲ 17.71	102.97	106.62	▼ 3.65	▲ 14.06
Sat 1/9/2021	@ Winthrop₈₆	L 67.78 - 78.19	L 65-75	3-7	94.03	81.41	▼ 12.62	104.74	87.99	▲ 16.75	▲ 4.13
Sun 1/10/2021	@ Winthrop₈₆	L 67.78 - 78.19	L 83-91	3-8	94.03	104.61	▲ 10.58	104.74	110.21	▼ 5.47	▲ 5.11
Tue 1/19/2021	vs UNC Asheville₂₄₅	W 75.30 - 67.62	L 75-79	3-9	104.23	108.16	▲ 3.93	97.50	118.31	▼ 20.81	▼ 16.88
Wed 1/20/2021	vs UNC Asheville₂₄₅	W 75.30 - 67.62	W 84-57	4-9	104.23	126.95	▲ 22.72	97.50	86.07	▲ 11.43	▲ 34.15
Sun 1/24/2021	vs Charleston So.₃₃₃	W 76.84 - 61.32	W 74-62	5-9	106.80	100.02	▼ 6.78	89.84	81.26	▲ 8.58	▲ 1.80
Mon 1/25/2021	vs Charleston So.₃₃₃	W 76.84 - 61.32	W 80-71	6-9	106.80	129.01	▲ 22.21	89.84	113.43	▼ 23.59	▼ 1.38
Fri 1/29/2021	vs High Point₂₈₄	W 72.09 - 62.14	L 55-59	6-10	104.92	83.80	▼ 21.12	94.94	94.33	▲ 0.61	▼ 20.51
Sat 1/30/2021	vs High Point₂₈₄	W 72.09 - 62.14	L 69-72	6-11	104.92	110.52	▲ 5.60	94.94	118.27	▼ 23.33	▼ 17.73
Thu 2/4/2021	vs Presbyterian₃₁₁	W 70.84 - 58.83	W 59-53	7-11	105.02	85.27	▼ 19.75	91.70	78.67	▲ 13.03	▼ 6.72
Fri 2/5/2021	vs Presbyterian₃₁₁	W 70.84 - 58.83	W 91-64	8-11	105.02	152.76	▲ 47.74	91.70	110.30	▼ 18.60	▲ 29.14
Mon 2/8/2021	@ USC Upstate₂₉₄	W 72.68 - 67.25	L 69-77	8-12	106.61	96.09	▼ 10.52	94.83	102.03	▼ 7.20	▼ 17.72
Thu 2/11/2021	@ Longwood₂₁₉	W 66.29 - 65.97	L 54-57	8-13	102.95	86.51	▼ 16.44	98.72	86.92	▲ 11.80	▼ 4.64
Fri 2/12/2021	@ Longwood₂₁₉	W 66.29 - 65.97	L 71-78	8-14	102.95	103.57	▲ 0.62	98.72	107.72	▼ 9.00	▼ 8.38
Wed 2/17/2021	@ Radford₂₁₂	W 64.58 - 64.48	W 69-57	9-14	102.13	110.76	▲ 8.63	98.28	98.75	▼ 0.47	▲ 8.16
Thu 2/18/2021	@ Radford₂₁₂	W 64.58 - 64.48	W 77-49	10-14	102.13	123.57	▲ 21.44	98.28	89.73	▲ 8.55	▲ 29.99
Mon 2/22/2021	@ USC Upstate₂₉₄	W 72.68 - 67.25	W 69-58	11-14	106.61	103.61	▼ 3.00	94.83	82.71	▲ 12.12	▲ 9.12
Mon 3/1/2021	@ Campbell₁₈₉	L 66.63 - 68.03	L 57-63	11-15	104.39	102.14	▼ 2.25	102.97	106.48	▼ 3.51	▼ 5.76
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Gardner-Webb does worse vs. clubs that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. When playing squads that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 39.77%, Gardner-Webb performs above average 22% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 65% of the time.
	Gardner-Webb performs worse against squads that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. When facing teams that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.86%, Gardner-Webb is more efficient than normal 35% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 78% of the time.
	When playing teams that allow more chances at the line, Gardner-Webb usually performs worse than average. Gardner-Webb is more efficient than normal 33% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 25.21. In all other contests, Gardner-Webb performs better than average 73% of the time.

LATEST NEWS ITEMS:

	Sears lifts Gardner-Webb past South Carolina Upstate 69-58 (2/22/2021 9:17:59 PM) SPARTANBURG, S.C. (AP) — Jordan Sears and Jacob Falko each scored 18 points to lift Gardner-Webb to a 69-58 win over South Carolina Upstate on Monday night.
	Cornwall scores 22 to lead Gardner-Webb over Radford 77-49 (2/18/2021 8:41:43 PM) RADFORD, Va. (AP) — Jaheam Cornwall had 22 points as Gardner-Webb routed Radford 77-49 on Thursday night.
	Cornwall scores 20 to carry Gardner-Webb past Radford 69-57 (2/17/2021 8:35:11 PM) RADFORD, Va. (AP) — Jaheam Cornwall had 20 points as Gardner-Webb defeated Radford 69-57 on Wednesday night.
	Wade scores 24 to lead Longwood past Gardner-Webb 57-54 (2/11/2021 7:26:53 PM) FARMVILLE, Va. (AP) — DeShaun Wade had a career-high 24 points as Longwood narrowly beat Gardner-Webb 57-54 on Thursday.
	South Carolina Upstate tops Gardner-Webb 77-69 (2/8/2021 7:56:17 PM) SPARTANBURG, S.C. (AP) — Tommy Bruner posted 19 points as South Carolina Upstate defeated Gardner-Webb 77-69 on Monday.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox