TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 Gardner-Webb  20-15 (0.571)  |  Big South
All-Play Percentage: 0.409 (208th)
Schedule Strength: 0.459 (201st)
Record Quality: -0.003 (175th)
Avg. Season Rank: 199.13 (199th)
Pace: 68.36 (35th)
Momentum: 1.88 (79th)
Off. Momentum: 1.23 (131st)
Def. Momentum: 0.65 (89th)
Consistency: -10.15 (283rd)
Res. Consistency: -11.30 (162nd)
Away From Home: 0.98 (66th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.24 (19th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.91 27.36 68.42 81.75 43.29 33.07 34.51 22.87 38.65 25.82 58.64 10.55 13.71 4.93 40.45 27.97 31.58 2.09
RANK: 153rd 230th 206th 180th 153rd 36th 163rd 263rd 37th 280th 166th 219th 250th 321st 35th 268th 285th 327th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 106.41 24.29 -- 84.91 47.16 25.19 37.51 27.87 37.78 31.85 63.01 11.82 16.07 8.80 29.67 32.82 37.52 1.92
RANK: 282nd 30th -- 296th 320th 61st 307th 276th 257th 305th 295th 209th 240th 325th 37th 246th 275th 309th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, Gardner-Webb is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. Haslametrics has them ranked 208th overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 20-15. They are also ranked by this site as the #5 team (out of 11) in the Big South (average ranking 237.1).

If there is a strength for Gardner-Webb this year, it's probably on the offensive end of the court. The team is rated 153rd in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 100 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Gardner-Webb will make a concerted effort to fire off quite a few three-pointers each game. The team ranks 35th in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. When it comes to actually making their three-point attempts, the squad shoots a so-so 34.5% from beyond the arc vs. AO. Gardner-Webb also has a keen ability to drain field goals between the three-point line and the low post. The squad is ranked 37th nationally in mid-range field goal percentage, making about 38.6% of their attempts from those locations vs. AO. If Gardner-Webb does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties obtaining and converting second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad has a second-chance conversion percentage of just 4.9% vs. AO, which ranks 31st-worst in the nation.

The defense for Gardner-Webb, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the offense is. The team is ranked 282nd in defensive efficiency, allowing about 106 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Gardner-Webb gives up too many chances to easily score off of offensive rebounds. The team allows AO to convert 8.8% of all second-chance opportunities (325th nationally). Gardner-Webb also allows opponents' field goal percentages to get far too high. The ball-club ranks #320 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 47.2% of their total attempts from the floor. If Gardner-Webb does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success preventing opponents from getting to the free throw line. The team has a defensive free throw attempt rate of 24.29 vs. AO, which ranks 30th-best in the country.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Gardner-Webb performs worse against squads that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. When facing teams that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.31%, Gardner-Webb is more efficient than normal 41% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 89% of the time.
When playing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, Gardner-Webb usually performs better than average. Gardner-Webb is more efficient than normal 68% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 1.95. In all other contests, Gardner-Webb performs better than average 22% of the time.
Gardner-Webb is typically worse vs. teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. Against foes that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 60.32%, Gardner-Webb performs above their norm 27% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 70% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox