TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Cincinnati  22-15 (0.595)  |  Big 12
All-Play Percentage: 0.909 (35th)
Schedule Strength: 0.662 (57th)
Record Quality: 0.237 (72nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 34.67 (31st)
Pace: 67.35 (216th)
Momentum: 0.73 (136th)
Off. Momentum: -1.04 (256th)
Def. Momentum: 1.77 (62nd)
Consistency: -8.68 (121st)
Res. Consistency: -10.99 (98th)
Away From Home: -1.12 (283rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.95 (171st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 113.10 25.10 67.53 92.32 45.90 32.95 34.59 23.67 40.85 35.70 59.69 12.14 18.81 6.80 35.69 25.64 38.67 1.97
RANK: 58th 235th 316th 4th 89th 131st 171st 149th 100th 33rd 110th 140th 8th 65th 224th 204th 96th 110th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.37 23.64 -- 84.82 40.56 28.89 32.85 24.93 34.50 31.01 52.62 8.95 11.54 5.24 34.05 29.39 36.56 1.97
RANK: 25th 72nd -- 145th 34th 68th 93rd 266th 19th 186th 32nd 24th 48th 143rd 70th 280th 193rd 260th

ANALYSIS:
Cincinnati has been extremely effective at times this year and should be regarded as a serious opponent. Carrying a record of 22-15, they are currently rated #35 overall (out of 362) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 14 schools in the Big 12 (average ranking 44.9), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference.

Cincinnati has been a force on the defensive end of the court. The team is rated 25th in defensive efficiency and allows fewer than 97 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Cincinnati will take a bite out of many opponents' shooting percentages, based on the fact that the team ranks in the top-50 in three of our four primary defensive field goal categories. They're most likely to shut you down inside the three-point arc, considering the team limits AO to converting just 34.5% of their mid-range jumpers (19th in the nation), 52.6% of their near-proximity chances (32nd), and 40.6% of their total shots from the field (34th). Cincinnati is also a solid rebounding team that will deny the opposition chances to score off of offensive rebounds. They have a rating of 11.54 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked 48th in the country).

Cincinnati plays at about the same level on offense as they do on defense. The team ranks 58th nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 113 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Cincinnati is one of the very best when it comes to maximizing field goal opportunities. The team is ranked fourth in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 92.32 vs. AO. And when they do shoot, they make a fair portion of their shots. Ranked in the top-100 in field goal shooting percentage, the squad converts about 45.9% of their total attempts vs. AO. Cincinnati also appears to be one of the top-notch offensive rebounding teams you will find this year. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 18.81 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked eighth in the NCAA). Cincinnati lastly allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.95, which ranks #24 in the country. If Cincinnati does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's poor shooting at the line. The squad makes just 67.5% of their free throw attempts, which ranks 47th-worst in Division I.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that tend to allow more shots on the perimeter, Cincinnati often performs better than normal. Cincinnati is more efficient than usual 61% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.01. In their other contests, Cincinnati performs better than the norm 14% of the time.
Cincinnati does worse vs. clubs that convert well from outside the arc. When playing squads that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.08%, Cincinnati performs above average 17% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 56% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox