TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Charleston So.  6-25 (0.194)  |  Big South
All-Play Percentage: 0.048 (341st)
Schedule Strength: 0.345 (268th)
Record Quality: -0.497 (353rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 337.55 (340th)
Pace: 70.53 (69th)
Momentum: 2.41 (64th)
Off. Momentum: 3.24 (30th)
Def. Momentum: -0.84 (200th)
Consistency: -8.92 (141st)
Res. Consistency: -9.65 (44th)
Away From Home: -0.90 (279th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.60 (140th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 89.86 19.94 67.75 83.02 39.07 36.30 31.62 20.55 34.88 26.17 52.70 11.22 15.89 6.27 43.73 24.75 31.52 2.12
RANK: 336th 331st 303rd 213th 343rd 48th 290th 274th 306th 288th 332nd 165th 57th 50th 40th 269th 288th 321st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 110.58 24.18 -- 83.07 48.30 32.54 36.31 20.63 41.02 29.90 66.37 11.56 13.05 6.32 39.17 24.84 35.99 2.03
RANK: 339th 198th -- 150th 349th 234th 304th 62nd 305th 232nd 353rd 215th 164th 318th 238th 67th 243rd 182nd

ANALYSIS:
Not one of the better ball-clubs in college basketball, Charleston So. should be a fairly easy win for most capable opponents. Ranked 341st overall (out of 358) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 6-25. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of 12) in the Big South (average ranking 247.2).

Charleston So. has one of the most inept defenses in the NCAA. Allowing about 111 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they're ranked way down at #339 in defensive efficiency. Charleston So. fares terribly when attempting to stop opponents from converting from the inside. The team is ranked sixth from the bottom in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 66.4% of their attempts from close-up. Charleston So. is also one of the very worst teams in the country in terms of overall defensive field goal percentage. The ball-club ranks #349 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 48.3% of their total attempts from the floor.

Charleston So. doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 90 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #336 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Charleston So. is among the worst of the worst when it comes to field goal shooting. The team is rated #343 in the country in field goal percentage, making good on a meager 39.1% of their attempts vs. AO. Charleston So. also won't provide opponents much of a scare with their shooting percentage from the inside. The team is ranked 332nd in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 52.7% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. If Charleston So. does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's ability to obtain and convert second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad has a second-chance conversion percentage of 6.3% vs. AO, which ranks 50th in the nation.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Charleston So. does better vs. clubs that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities. When playing squads that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 11.33, Charleston So. performs above average 90% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 39% of the time.
Charleston So. performs worse against squads that find ways to get to the free throw line. When facing teams that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 22.52, Charleston So. is more efficient than normal 44% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 80% of the time.
When playing teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint, Charleston So. usually performs better than average. Charleston So. is more efficient than normal 68% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 59.81%. In all other contests, Charleston So. performs better than average 33% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Buskey leads Charleston Southern past Toccoa Falls 97-60
(2/7/2022 11:05:22 PM) CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) — Deontaye Buskey had 17 points as Charleston Southern rolled past Toccoa Falls 97-60 on Monday night.
Stroud leads Kennesaw St. over Charleston Southern 89-52
(11/28/2021 9:30:27 PM) KENNESAW, Ga. (AP) — Brandon Stroud had 15 points to lead five Kennesaw State players in double figures as the Owls rolled past Charleston Southern 89...
Charleston Southern vs. Georgia Tech - Game Preview - November 22, 2021 - ESPN
(11/21/2021 6:45:39 AM) Get a preview of the Charleston Southern Buccaneers vs. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets basketball game.
Ga. Tech squares off against CSU
(11/21/2021 6:34:41 AM) ATLANTA - Charleston Southern (2-2) vs. Georgia Tech (3-1)
Charleston Southern routs Bob Jones University 119-63
(11/20/2021 9:31:23 PM) CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) — Deontaye Buskey and Kalib Clinton scored 16 points apiece as Charleston Southern romped past Bob Jones University 119-63 on Sa...
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox