Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2016-17 Tulsa 15-17 (0.469) | American

All-Play Percentage: 0.586 (146^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.628 (80^th)	Record Quality: 0.033 (147^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 152.44 (148^th)
Pace: 69.93 (197^th)	Momentum: -4.81 (337^th)	Off. Momentum: 0.59 (181^st)	Def. Momentum: -5.40 (349^th)
Consistency: -8.22 (86^th)	Res. Consistency: -12.11 (235^th)	Away From Home: -2.07 (322^nd)	Paper Tiger Factor: -1.13 (182^nd)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2017. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

102.45

32.55

73.26

76.90

44.64

28.65

34.76

20.44

32.63

27.81

63.64

7.45

13.03

5.99

37.25

26.58

36.16

2.01

RANK:

150^th

19^th

86^th

343^rd

136^th

207^th

194^th

279^th

326^th

207^th

63^rd

338^th

256^th

239^th

143^rd

246^th

122^nd

181^st

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

101.51

26.99

81.45

43.12

33.35

36.22

24.57

36.28

23.52

60.06

13.00

12.45

5.32

40.95

30.17

28.88

2.12

RANK:

151^st

152^nd

116^th

318^th

230^th

216^th

144^th

24^th

168^th

326^th

35^th

47^th

325^th

224^th

26^th

14^th

ANALYSIS:
As an average to slightly above-average foe, Tulsa should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. Haslametrics has them ranked 146th overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage, and the team holds a record of 15-17. Of the 11 schools in the AAC (average ranking 117.5), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference.

If there is a strength for Tulsa this year, it's probably on the offensive end of the court. The team is rated 150th in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 102 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Tulsa does a super job in their efforts to get to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 32.55 vs. AO, they are ranked 19th in the nation at getting to the charity stripe. In addition, the team is in the top-100 in free throw shooting, converting a solid 73.3% of their attempts. Tulsa also fares better than most teams when it comes to converting from locations close to the basket. The team is ranked 63rd in the country in near-proximity field goal percentage, making approximately 63.6% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. If Tulsa does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties in getting off a sufficient number of shots each possession. The squad has a field goal attempt rate of just 76.90 vs. AO, which ranks ninth-worst in college basketball.

Tulsa plays at roughly the same level defensively as they do offensively. The team ranks 151st nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 102 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Tulsa is a solid rebounding team that will deny the opposition chances to score off of offensive rebounds. They have a rating of 12.45 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of second chances (ranked 35th in the country), and they allow AO to convert just 5.3% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 47th) as well. If Tulsa does exhibit a noticeable weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's unwillingness to take risks in order to score fast points off of the opposition's turnovers. The squad only has a rating of 7.45 in potential points scored off of steals vs. AO, which ranks 14th-worst in the college game.

Tulsa has definitely not been as efficient as of late compared to earlier in the season and, consequently, the team is nationally ranked 337th in positive momentum. When playing on the road, Tulsa performs somewhat worse than they normally do on their home court. The club is nationally ranked 322nd in our site's away-from-home metric.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Fri 11/11/2016	vs Jacksonville St.₁₇₀	W 70.25 - 65.92	L 73-84	0-1	102.66	102.26	▼ 0.40	100.16	121.06	▼ 20.90	▼ 21.30
Wed 11/16/2016	@ Wichita State₈	L 60.68 - 83.38	L 53-80	0-2	89.08	71.57	▼ 17.51	115.46	108.72	▲ 6.74	▼ 10.77
Sat 11/19/2016	vs New Orleans₂₀₇	W 70.78 - 63.87	W 77-68	1-2	102.46	111.22	▲ 8.76	96.55	99.27	▼ 2.72	▲ 6.04
Tue 11/22/2016	vs Oregon State₂₇₅	W 71.63 - 60.73	W 75-64	2-2	103.89	108.39	▲ 4.50	92.10	97.74	▼ 5.64	▼ 1.14
Mon 11/28/2016	@ Oral Roberts₂₀₃	W 74.84 - 74.05	W 79-65	3-2	108.25	112.51	▲ 4.26	102.37	83.08	▲ 19.29	▲ 23.55
Sat 12/3/2016	@ Little Rock₂₃₄	W 66.76 - 64.21	L 62-72	3-3	104.19	88.78	▼ 15.41	95.68	108.55	▼ 12.87	▼ 28.28
Wed 12/7/2016	vs Illinois State₅₈	L 63.45 - 68.77	W 70-68	4-3	92.77	102.26	▲ 9.49	104.09	105.25	▼ 1.16	▲ 8.33
Sat 12/10/2016	vs Oklahoma State₂₀	L 73.36 - 87.17	L 67-71	4-4	98.89	90.84	▼ 8.05	121.28	99.48	▲ 21.80	▲ 13.75
Sat 12/17/2016	vs Texas State₁₆₀	W 65.85 - 62.37	W 74-59	5-4	98.61	99.23	▲ 0.62	97.02	84.57	▲ 12.45	▲ 13.07
Thu 12/22/2016	vs Stephen F. Austin₂₅₉ *	W 70.86 - 63.66	W 74-51	6-4	103.13	111.48	▲ 8.35	92.79	79.03	▲ 13.76	▲ 22.11
Fri 12/23/2016	vs San Diego State₈₇ *	L 63.41 - 67.87	L 63-82	6-5	94.84	92.42	▼ 2.42	100.49	121.54	▼ 21.05	▼ 23.47
Sun 12/25/2016	vs Illinois State₅₈ *	L 61.97 - 70.20	L 56-68	6-6	92.77	81.16	▼ 11.61	104.09	97.14	▲ 6.95	▼ 4.66
Sat 12/31/2016	vs UConn₈₀	L 66.24 - 68.17	W 61-59 (OT)	7-6	96.73	89.59	▼ 7.14	103.21	91.10	▲ 12.11	▲ 4.97
Wed 1/4/2017	@ Houston₄₇	L 63.19 - 76.20	L 61-64	7-7	96.04	100.60	▲ 4.56	110.22	97.78	▲ 12.44	▲ 17.00
Wed 1/11/2017	vs Memphis₁₀₀	L 71.41 - 71.96	W 81-71	8-7	100.09	107.51	▲ 7.42	104.47	95.46	▲ 9.01	▲ 16.43
Sat 1/14/2017	@ Temple₁₀₈	L 68.08 - 73.82	W 70-68	9-7	101.31	109.91	▲ 8.60	104.46	100.81	▲ 3.65	▲ 12.25
Wed 1/18/2017	vs Tulane₂₄₃	W 79.24 - 69.53	W 89-82	10-7	107.96	112.26	▲ 4.30	98.59	102.22	▼ 3.63	▲ 0.67
Sat 1/21/2017	@ USF₂₈₉	W 73.35 - 67.18	W 79-67	11-7	106.84	103.55	▼ 3.29	93.76	80.22	▲ 13.54	▲ 10.25
Wed 1/25/2017	@ ECU₁₈₀	L 65.67 - 66.57	L 66-69	11-8	96.99	92.63	▼ 4.36	93.54	91.03	▲ 2.51	▼ 1.85
Sat 1/28/2017	vs UCF₆₉	L 63.78 - 67.44	W 77-66	12-8	92.22	112.71	▲ 20.49	101.22	103.75	▼ 2.53	▲ 17.96
Wed 2/1/2017	vs Cincinnati₁₆	L 60.34 - 73.42	L 55-57	12-9	89.95	89.45	▼ 0.50	113.11	95.66	▲ 17.45	▲ 16.95
Sat 2/4/2017	vs SMU₁₅	L 61.83 - 75.37	L 53-76	12-10	92.62	74.98	▼ 17.64	116.55	117.73	▼ 1.18	▼ 18.82
Tue 2/7/2017	@ Memphis₁₀₀	L 68.33 - 74.96	L 44-66	12-11	100.09	73.40	▼ 26.69	104.47	101.12	▲ 3.35	▼ 23.34
Sat 2/11/2017	vs Houston₄₇	L 66.16 - 73.20	L 64-73	12-12	96.04	90.32	▼ 5.72	110.22	112.82	▼ 2.60	▼ 8.32
Tue 2/14/2017	@ UCF₆₉	L 60.80 - 70.31	L 53-71	12-13	92.22	84.18	▼ 8.04	101.22	110.90	▼ 9.68	▼ 17.72
Sat 2/18/2017	@ Cincinnati₁₆	L 57.46 - 76.29	L 60-80	12-14	89.95	91.69	▲ 1.74	113.11	123.65	▼ 10.54	▼ 8.80
Thu 2/23/2017	vs USF₂₈₉	W 76.45 - 64.25	W 82-68	13-14	106.84	108.90	▲ 2.06	93.76	99.36	▼ 5.60	▼ 3.54
Sun 2/26/2017	vs ECU₁₈₀	W 68.73 - 63.64	W 74-66	14-14	96.99	125.37	▲ 28.38	93.54	110.84	▼ 17.30	▲ 11.08
Thu 3/2/2017	@ SMU₁₅	L 58.95 - 78.24	L 70-93	14-15	92.62	87.63	▼ 4.99	116.55	144.84	▼ 28.29	▼ 33.28
Sun 3/5/2017	@ Tulane₂₄₃	W 76.06 - 72.68	L 69-81	14-16	107.96	103.69	▼ 4.27	98.59	115.18	▼ 16.59	▼ 20.86
Thu 3/9/2017	vs Tulane₂₄₃ *	W 77.65 - 71.10	W 66-60	15-16	107.96	97.06	▼ 10.90	98.59	88.24	▲ 10.35	▼ 0.55
Fri 3/10/2017	vs Cincinnati₁₆ *	L 58.90 - 74.86	L 61-80	15-17	89.95	94.92	▲ 4.97	113.11	130.51	▼ 17.40	▼ 12.43
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Tulsa performs better against squads that typically allow more than a fair share of breakaway opportunities. When facing teams that have a potential point rate allowed off steals vs. AO greater than 9.20, Tulsa is more efficient than normal 68% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 20% of the time.
	When playing teams that favor a faster tempo, Tulsa usually performs better than average. Tulsa is more efficient than normal 67% of the time when facing clubs that have a pace vs. AO greater than 67.48. In all other contests, Tulsa performs better than average 27% of the time.
	Tulsa is typically better vs. teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively. Against foes that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 94.45, Tulsa performs above their norm 67% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 27% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox