Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Cent. Michigan7-23 (0.233) | Mid-American
All-Play Percentage: 0.076 (331st)
Schedule Strength: 0.423 (186th)
Record Quality: -0.296 (314th)
Avg. Season Rank: 338.42 (342nd)
Pace: 69.32 (136th)
Momentum: 4.85 (15th)
Off. Momentum: 0.96 (141st)
Def. Momentum: 3.90 (5th)
Consistency: -9.83 (248th)
Res. Consistency: -15.82 (343rd)
Away From Home: 1.49 (53rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.24 (103rd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
92.39
69.35
23.62
70.88
80.31
32.44
40.40
31.98
10.77
33.67
24.64
9.15
37.14
23.69
12.53
52.88
9.73
12.30
3.44
39.82
30.68
29.50
2.10
RANK:
312th
134th
199th
200th
312th
337th
310th
157th
170th
180th
129th
146th
205th
334th
347th
327th
259th
218th
317th
113th
99th
328th
308th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
109.37
69.29
28.52
--
84.12
38.37
45.61
34.13
12.52
36.68
19.92
6.83
34.31
30.08
19.02
63.24
10.68
14.06
4.38
40.57
23.68
35.75
2.05
RANK:
327th
217th
328th
--
200th
268th
271st
294th
328th
319th
40th
26th
51st
241st
293rd
323rd
144th
236th
108th
277th
26th
230th
133rd
ANALYSIS: If you're looking for a squad in the bottom quartile of all Division I basketball teams this year, Cent. Michigan likely fits the bill. Ranked 331st overall (out of 358) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 7-23. Of the 12 schools in the MAC (average ranking 229.2), they're currently ranked as our #11 team in the conference.
Cent. Michigan will certainly not be one of the stingier defenses opponents will encounter. Allowing more than 109 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked down at #327 in defensive efficiency. Cent. Michigan commits too many fouls, which leads to plentiful free throw attempts for the opposition. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 28.52 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #328 in the country in that category. Cent. Michigan has also done a pretty poor job this season to prevent opponents from making shots from the inside. The team is ranked 323rd in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 63.2% of their attempts from close-up.
Cent. Michigan doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 92 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #312 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Cent. Michigan won't provide opponents much of a scare with their shooting percentage from the inside. The team is ranked 327th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 52.9% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. Moreover, they find themselves in the bottom-50 in overall offensive field goal percentage, converting just 40.4% of their total attempts vs. AO. Cent. Michigan is also one of the more deficient teams in the nation as it pertains to scoring off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team converts only 3.4% of all second-chance opportunities (317th nationally).
Cent. Michigan has been playing much better basketball as of late and is presently ranked 15th in positive momentum because of it.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Cent. Michigan performs better against squads that allow more chances at the line. When facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 23.94, Cent. Michigan is more efficient than normal 85% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 35% of the time.
When playing teams that convert well from the charity stripe, Cent. Michigan usually performs better than average. Cent. Michigan is more efficient than normal 79% of the time when facing clubs that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 0.73%. In all other contests, Cent. Michigan performs better than average 38% of the time.
Cent. Michigan is typically worse vs. teams that favor a faster tempo. Against foes that have a pace vs. AO greater than 67.82, Cent. Michigan performs above their norm 42% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 82% of the time.
Tshiebwe, No. 9 Kentucky overwhelm Central Michigan 86-57 (11/29/2021 11:03:56 PM) LEXINGTON, Ky. (AP) — Oscar Tshiebwe had 20 points and 16 rebounds, TyTy Washington Jr. added 15 points and No. 9 Kentucky quickly overwhelmed Central...
Tshiebwe helps No. 9 Kentucky rout Central Michigan 85-57 (11/29/2021 9:17:32 PM) LEXINGTON, Ky. (AP) — Oscar Tshiebwe had 20 points and 16 rebounds, TyTy Washington Jr. added 15 points and No. 9 Kentucky quickly overwhelmed Central...
No. 1 Gonzaga routs Central Michigan, to face No. 2 UCLA (11/23/2021 1:09:26 AM) Chet Holmgren scored 19 points and No. 1 Gonzaga breezed past Central Michigan 107-54 on Monday night in the Empire Classic to set up a Final Four rematch with No. 2 UCLA.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.