TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Canisius  10-20 (0.333)  |  MAAC
All-Play Percentage: 0.282 (261st)
Schedule Strength: 0.378 (253rd)
Record Quality: -0.264 (314th)
Avg. Season Rank: 275.06 (280th)
Pace: 68.11 (170th)
Momentum: 5.26 (11th)
Off. Momentum: 1.59 (119th)
Def. Momentum: 3.67 (6th)
Consistency: -8.81 (129th)
Res. Consistency: -9.78 (41st)
Away From Home: -0.32 (142nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.98 (186th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 99.63 19.54 72.85 87.20 42.08 35.09 34.23 26.22 37.97 25.88 56.89 10.32 10.16 4.61 40.24 30.08 29.68 2.11
RANK: 240th 359th 142nd 61st 274th 55th 166th 109th 166th 322nd 238th 207th 341st 259th 77th 133rd 340th 331st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 107.44 24.51 -- 84.40 47.24 27.20 36.86 21.98 37.02 35.21 61.63 10.93 11.65 5.29 32.23 26.05 41.72 1.91
RANK: 276th 147th -- 163rd 334th 38th 322nd 106th 145th 356th 276th 194th 33rd 181st 38th 92nd 361st 354th

ANALYSIS:
If you see Canisius on the schedule, you will likely get one of the average to below-average teams in college hoops. They have a record of 10-20 and are ranked 261st overall (out of 363) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 11 schools in the MAAC (average ranking 238.0), they're currently ranked as our #7 team in the conference.

Canisius does not provide much of a challenge on defense. They are ranked at #276 in efficiency on that end of the court and give up about 107 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Canisius allows opponents' field goal percentages to get far too high. The ball-club ranks #334 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 47.2% of their total attempts from the floor. Canisius also does a very lackluster job preventing opponents from draining threes. They rank 322nd nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 36.9% of their attempts from afar. Luckily, AO will take nowhere near as many threes as they typically would, and only 32.2% of AO's field goal attempts will come from downtown. If Canisius does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success stopping opponents from earning second-chance opportunities via offensive boards. The team has a rating of 11.65 in potential points allowed off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 33rd-best in college hoops.

Canisius doesn't rate much better on offense than they do on defense. Scoring roughly 100 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #240 in the nation in offensive efficiency. Canisius does an extremely poor job drawing fouls and getting to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of just 19.54 vs. AO, they are fifth from the bottom in the overall rankings for that category. Canisius also poses no threat whatsoever to grab rebounds off their own misses. Against AO, the ball-club has a rating of 10.16 in potential points scored off of second chances (341st nationally).

Canisius has been playing much better basketball as of late and is presently ranked 11th in positive momentum because of it.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that do a nice job converting inside the paint, Canisius often performs worse than normal. Canisius is more efficient than usual 40% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 55.38%. In their other contests, Canisius performs better than the norm 79% of the time.
Canisius does better vs. clubs that find ways to get to the free throw line. When playing squads that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 24.05, Canisius performs above average 82% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 44% of the time.
Canisius performs worse against squads that are likely to allow more second chances off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have a defensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 13.60, Canisius is more efficient than normal 44% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 82% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox