Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 Canisius 14-19 (0.424) | MAAC

All-Play Percentage: 0.337 (235^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.427 (235^th)	Record Quality: -0.120 (232^nd)	Avg. Season Rank: 201.10 (198^th)
Pace: 69.56 (178^th)	Momentum: -0.74 (202^nd)	Off. Momentum: -0.67 (235^th)	Def. Momentum: -0.06 (153^rd)
Consistency: -7.36 (18^th)	Res. Consistency: -10.02 (73^rd)	Away From Home: 0.57 (110^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -1.04 (192^nd)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

103.85

28.76

74.04

84.40

41.73

35.12

34.53

17.95

35.21

31.33

53.52

10.57

16.66

6.29

41.61

21.27

37.12

2.04

RANK:

128^th

162^nd

43^rd

71^st

263^rd

27^th

186^th

329^th

183^rd

69^th

312^th

180^th

84^th

208^th

38^th

334^th

101^st

260^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

112.05

30.12

81.09

48.63

29.05

38.47

19.15

37.96

32.89

63.82

9.91

14.70

7.86

35.82

23.62

40.56

1.95

RANK:

334^th

224^th

122^nd

340^th

188^th

330^th

16^th

265^th

303^rd

295^th

89^th

155^th

257^th

207^th

12^th

316^th

270^th

ANALYSIS:
If you see Canisius on the schedule, you will likely get one of the average to below-average teams in college hoops. They have a record of 14-19 and are ranked 235th overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 11 schools in the MAAC (average ranking 215.2), they're currently ranked as our #7 team in the conference.

If there is a strength for Canisius this year, it's probably on the offensive end of the court. The team is rated 128th in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 103 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Canisius will make a concerted effort to fire off quite a few three-pointers each game. The team ranks 38th in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. When it comes to actually making their three-point attempts, the squad shoots a so-so 34.5% from beyond the arc vs. AO. Canisius also does a really good job converting from the free throw line. Making 74.0% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 43rd nationally in free throw percentage. If Canisius does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's troubles converting from the inside. The squad makes just 53.5% of their near-proximity field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks 40th-worst in Division I.

Unfortunately, Canisius is not even remotely close to being as good on defense as they are on offense. The team is ranked 334th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 112 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Canisius is one of the very worst teams in the country in terms of overall defensive field goal percentage. The ball-club ranks #340 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO will convert approximately 48.6% of their total attempts from the floor. Canisius also does an extremely poor job to deny the opposition behind the arc. They rank 330th nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 38.5% of their attempts from afar.

Canisius is one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked 18th in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Fri 11/13/2015	@ Hofstra₁₀₅	L 71.09 - 85.20	L 85-96	0-1	103.02	110.71	▲ 7.69	117.21	119.16	▼ 1.95	▲ 5.74
Mon 11/16/2015	vs Lehigh₁₈₈	W 75.45 - 74.48	W 98-89	1-1	106.18	127.75	▲ 21.57	110.08	121.58	▼ 11.50	▲ 10.07
Sat 11/21/2015	vs Cornell₂₇₆	W 81.45 - 73.85	W 87-62	2-1	108.31	118.62	▲ 10.31	103.50	93.54	▲ 9.96	▲ 20.27
Tue 11/24/2015	vs St. Bonaventure₉₅	L 74.32 - 80.64	L 73-77	2-2	103.94	102.88	▼ 1.06	119.17	114.51	▲ 4.66	▲ 3.60
Sat 11/28/2015	@ Buffalo₁₄₈	L 73.33 - 83.05	L 96-98 (OT)	2-3	103.24	118.92	▲ 15.68	110.62	110.07	▲ 0.55	▲ 16.23
Fri 12/4/2015	vs Monmouth₉₉	L 75.24 - 81.66	W 96-86	3-3	99.58	116.31	▲ 16.73	114.11	109.33	▲ 4.78	▲ 21.51
Sat 12/5/2015	vs Quinnipiac₂₈₂	W 75.21 - 67.46	L 76-78	3-4	104.13	99.79	▼ 4.34	98.99	108.32	▼ 9.33	▼ 13.67
Thu 12/10/2015	@ Penn State₁₄₄	L 67.30 - 76.40	L 67-81	3-5	102.23	102.92	▲ 0.69	109.99	111.58	▼ 1.59	▼ 0.90
Sat 12/12/2015	@ Kent State₁₈₃	L 71.81 - 78.97	L 77-84	3-6	106.65	105.58	▼ 1.07	111.47	107.61	▲ 3.86	▲ 2.79
Sat 12/19/2015	vs Boston U₂₄₀	W 79.10 - 74.48	W 84-68	4-6	108.33	113.02	▲ 4.69	108.16	97.04	▲ 11.12	▲ 15.81
Tue 12/22/2015	vs UL Monroe₁₂₁ *	L 69.18 - 76.38	W 108-96 (3OT)	5-6	102.47	98.51	▼ 3.96	113.53	114.93	▼ 1.40	▼ 5.36
Wed 12/23/2015	vs Nicholls₃₃₆ *	W 78.44 - 68.93	W 83-74	6-6	110.25	120.29	▲ 10.04	97.08	104.41	▼ 7.33	▲ 2.71
Sat 1/2/2016	@ Marist₃₁₉	W 78.40 - 75.45	W 92-83	7-6	116.12	128.95	▲ 12.83	106.69	112.36	▼ 5.67	▲ 7.16
Mon 1/4/2016	@ Monmouth₉₉	L 71.01 - 85.98	L 66-81	7-7	99.58	95.56	▼ 4.02	114.11	116.20	▼ 2.09	▼ 6.11
Thu 1/7/2016	vs Manhattan₂₄₅	W 75.87 - 70.85	L 86-94	7-8	105.89	114.27	▲ 8.38	104.83	140.42	▼ 35.59	▼ 27.21
Sat 1/9/2016	vs St. Peter's₂₁₆	W 69.82 - 66.86	L 53-70	7-9	102.13	72.08	▼ 30.05	103.65	98.57	▲ 5.08	▼ 24.97
Tue 1/12/2016	@ Dartmouth₂₃₂	L 71.34 - 75.33	L 69-80	7-10	105.86	98.51	▼ 7.35	105.88	110.32	▼ 4.44	▼ 11.79
Fri 1/15/2016	@ Manhattan₂₄₅	L 71.84 - 74.86	W 65-62	8-10	105.89	99.93	▼ 5.96	104.83	88.26	▲ 16.57	▲ 10.61
Sun 1/17/2016	@ Quinnipiac₂₈₂	L 71.15 - 71.27	W 63-53	9-10	104.13	104.59	▲ 0.46	98.99	83.49	▲ 15.50	▲ 15.96
Fri 1/22/2016	@ Niagara₂₉₃	W 70.48 - 70.19	W 70-61	10-10	106.64	108.98	▲ 2.34	100.74	90.93	▲ 9.81	▲ 12.15
Sun 1/24/2016	vs Siena₁₂₆	L 75.83 - 78.68	L 78-99	10-11	103.42	97.08	▼ 6.34	112.99	147.18	▼ 34.19	▼ 40.53
Fri 1/29/2016	@ Fairfield₂₂₃	L 76.77 - 81.37	L 77-84	10-12	108.50	108.40	▼ 0.10	109.14	115.39	▼ 6.25	▼ 6.35
Sun 1/31/2016	@ Rider₂₁₄	L 67.21 - 71.92	L 68-79	10-13	104.02	109.17	▲ 5.15	105.97	120.52	▼ 14.55	▼ 9.40
Fri 2/5/2016	vs Iona₁₁₅	L 77.84 - 82.28	L 66-84	10-14	103.69	90.04	▼ 13.65	115.37	116.81	▼ 1.44	▼ 15.09
Sun 2/7/2016	vs Rider₂₁₄	W 71.05 - 68.20	W 67-61	11-14	104.02	100.16	▼ 3.86	105.97	98.23	▲ 7.74	▲ 3.88
Thu 2/11/2016	@ Siena₁₂₆	L 71.70 - 82.77	L 67-90	11-15	103.42	90.98	▼ 12.44	112.99	117.98	▼ 4.99	▼ 17.43
Sun 2/14/2016	@ St. Peter's₂₁₆	L 65.97 - 70.49	L 57-61	11-16	102.13	93.39	▼ 8.74	103.65	95.47	▲ 8.18	▼ 0.56
Thu 2/18/2016	vs Fairfield₂₂₃	W 80.97 - 77.21	L 71-74	11-17	108.50	97.08	▼ 11.42	109.14	110.16	▼ 1.02	▼ 12.44
Sat 2/20/2016	vs Marist₃₁₉	W 82.42 - 71.51	W 81-66	12-17	116.12	128.75	▲ 12.63	106.69	104.56	▲ 2.13	▲ 14.76
Thu 2/25/2016	vs Niagara₂₉₃	W 74.42 - 66.37	W 65-60	13-17	106.64	91.29	▼ 15.35	100.74	91.15	▲ 9.59	▼ 5.76
Sun 2/28/2016	@ Iona₁₁₅	L 73.63 - 86.43	L 78-86	13-18	103.69	111.25	▲ 7.56	115.37	118.21	▼ 2.84	▲ 4.72
Thu 3/3/2016	vs Niagara₂₉₃ *	W 72.45 - 68.28	W 102-97 (3OT)	14-18	106.64	118.33	▲ 11.69	100.74	118.33	▼ 17.59	▼ 5.90
Fri 3/4/2016	vs Iona₁₁₅ *	L 75.73 - 84.36	L 55-73	14-19	103.69	93.55	▼ 10.14	115.37	116.39	▼ 1.02	▼ 11.16
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	When facing teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint, Canisius often performs better than normal. Canisius is more efficient than usual 80% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 59.36%. In their other contests, Canisius performs better than the norm 44% of the time.
	Canisius does better vs. clubs that do not defend well on the perimeter. When playing squads that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 35.76%, Canisius performs above average 80% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 44% of the time.
	Canisius performs better against squads that prefer the outside shot. When facing teams that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 1.98, Canisius is more efficient than normal 65% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 30% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox