Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Binghamton 13-18 (0.419) | America East

All-Play Percentage: 0.149 (309^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.334 (289^th)	Record Quality: -0.209 (289^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 315.80 (322^nd)
Pace: 67.18 (222^nd)	Momentum: -0.14 (185^th)	Off. Momentum: -1.43 (303^rd)	Def. Momentum: 1.29 (65^th)
Consistency: -9.61 (234^th)	Res. Consistency: -12.59 (211^th)	Away From Home: 0.04 (109^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -1.94 (269^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

95.95

23.20

69.80

83.65

42.69

26.94

30.97

33.11

39.66

23.60

60.32

7.72

13.14

4.91

32.20

39.58

28.21

2.04

RANK:

301^st

278^th

257^th

220^th

242^nd

314^th

328^th

5^th

97^th

360^th

125^th

332^nd

235^th

223^rd

310^th

4^th

356^th

225^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

108.11

29.50

84.90

45.35

27.49

34.16

30.49

41.46

26.92

61.20

11.10

16.39

6.14

32.38

35.91

31.70

2.01

RANK:

284^th

329^th

183^rd

262^nd

50^th

186^th

356^th

325^th

73^rd

260^th

208^th

328^th

296^th

44^th

357^th

55^th

206^th

ANALYSIS:
If you're looking for a squad in the bottom quartile of all Division I basketball teams this year, Binghamton likely fits the bill. Ranked 309th overall (out of 363) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 13-18. They are also ranked by this site as the #7 team (out of nine) in the America East (average ranking 246.3).

Offense is not the strong suit when it comes to Binghamton. The team is ranked 301st in offensive efficiency and scores fewer than 96 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Binghamton won't enter the conversation if you're looking to list the best three-point shooting teams in the country. They are ranked 328th in three-point field goal percentage nationally and make just 31.0% of their attempts from long vs. AO.

Binghamton doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 108 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #284 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Binghamton does a pretty inadequate job to provide chances for themselves to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked #332 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 7.72 vs. AO. Binghamton also commits too many fouls, which leads to plentiful free throw attempts for the opposition. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 29.50 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #329 in the country in that category.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Mon 11/7/2022	vs Cazenovia	---	W 87-56	1-0	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 11/12/2022	@ Marist₂₈₉	L 63.44 - 67.11	W 78-75	2-0	98.91	108.85	▲ 9.94	99.90	100.74	▼ 0.84	▲ 9.10
Tue 11/15/2022	@ Maryland₂₀	L 54.27 - 77.42	L 52-76	2-1	86.06	64.00	▼ 22.06	117.11	119.57	▼ 2.46	▼ 24.52
Sat 11/19/2022	vs Sacred Heart₃₂₇	W 72.45 - 67.64	L 60-75	2-2	101.68	85.54	▼ 16.14	98.80	107.80	▼ 9.00	▼ 25.14
Wed 11/23/2022	vs Columbia₃₄₀	W 71.74 - 65.52	W 81-79	3-2	102.26	112.08	▲ 9.82	96.76	111.72	▼ 14.96	▼ 5.14
Sat 11/26/2022	@ La Salle₂₂₆	L 65.62 - 72.93	L 62-65	3-3	98.86	86.93	▼ 11.93	104.86	87.04	▲ 17.82	▲ 5.89
Wed 11/30/2022	vs Loyola (MD)₃₃₇	W 69.95 - 64.48	L 70-84	3-4	104.42	102.61	▼ 1.81	99.47	124.73	▼ 25.26	▼ 27.07
Sat 12/3/2022	vs Stonehill₃₁₈	W 68.41 - 64.71	L 66-69	3-5	99.89	93.65	▼ 6.24	98.66	102.00	▼ 3.34	▼ 9.58
Wed 12/7/2022	vs Colgate₁₁₈	L 67.58 - 76.20	L 62-81	3-6	98.16	98.00	▼ 0.16	114.14	139.50	▼ 25.36	▼ 25.52
Fri 12/9/2022	@ Fordham₁₂₄	L 61.34 - 75.81	L 62-77	3-7	90.77	84.19	▼ 6.58	106.48	96.63	▲ 9.85	▲ 3.27
Sat 12/17/2022	vs SUNY Oneonta	---	W 86-58	4-7	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Wed 12/21/2022	@ Niagara₂₅₉	L 61.32 - 66.50	L 67-73	4-8	99.73	98.07	▼ 1.66	102.89	103.97	▼ 1.08	▼ 2.74
Thu 12/29/2022	@ Cornell₁₃₃	L 68.69 - 82.68	L 70-86	4-9	99.02	108.25	▲ 9.23	114.45	131.87	▼ 17.42	▼ 8.19
Sat 12/31/2022	@ Bryant₂₁₀	L 68.66 - 77.92	L 78-82	4-10	99.03	108.85	▲ 9.82	107.04	108.81	▼ 1.77	▲ 8.05
Thu 1/5/2023	vs UNH₂₉₉	W 65.39 - 63.58	W 68-50	5-10	99.50	112.28	▲ 12.78	100.03	71.09	▲ 28.94	▲ 41.72
Wed 1/11/2023	@ NJIT₃₃₆	W 67.35 - 67.24	W 72-71 (OT)	6-10	104.11	98.83	▼ 5.28	99.15	90.19	▲ 8.96	▲ 3.68
Sat 1/14/2023	vs UMass Lowell₁₂₆	L 65.44 - 73.99	W 66-65	7-10	94.13	95.06	▲ 0.93	110.54	99.02	▲ 11.52	▲ 12.45
Thu 1/19/2023	@ Albany₃₄₃	W 69.72 - 68.55	W 65-54	8-10	105.55	103.83	▼ 1.72	99.86	83.21	▲ 16.65	▲ 14.93
Sun 1/22/2023	@ Maine₂₇₃	L 64.41 - 68.93	L 57-78	8-11	99.77	85.61	▼ 14.16	102.38	108.94	▼ 6.56	▼ 20.72
Wed 1/25/2023	vs Vermont₁₀₀	L 61.81 - 71.79	L 55-80	8-12	93.71	87.65	▼ 6.06	112.83	124.04	▼ 11.21	▼ 17.27
Sat 1/28/2023	vs Bryant₂₁₀	L 71.49 - 75.00	W 84-67	9-12	99.03	113.15	▲ 14.12	107.04	92.77	▲ 14.27	▲ 28.39
Wed 2/1/2023	@ UMBC₂₂₁	L 67.63 - 75.51	L 55-69	9-13	102.51	88.89	▼ 13.62	109.31	109.29	▲ 0.02	▼ 13.60
Wed 2/8/2023	@ UNH₂₉₉	L 62.80 - 66.18	W 66-64	10-13	99.50	106.76	▲ 7.26	100.03	98.00	▲ 2.03	▲ 9.29
Sat 2/11/2023	vs Albany₃₄₃	W 72.43 - 65.79	W 80-66 (OT)	11-13	105.55	94.92	▼ 10.63	99.86	100.44	▼ 0.58	▼ 11.21
Wed 2/15/2023	vs NJIT₃₃₆	W 70.01 - 64.61	W 86-67	12-13	104.11	133.48	▲ 29.37	99.15	103.62	▼ 4.47	▲ 24.90
Sat 2/18/2023	@ UMass Lowell₁₂₆	L 62.72 - 76.79	L 70-84	12-14	94.13	104.94	▲ 10.81	110.54	123.37	▼ 12.83	▼ 2.02
Wed 2/22/2023	@ Vermont₁₀₀	L 59.22 - 74.42	L 70-81	12-15	93.71	107.66	▲ 13.95	112.83	118.89	▼ 6.06	▲ 7.89
Sat 2/25/2023	vs Maine₂₇₃	W 67.06 - 66.23	L 67-71 (OT)	12-16	99.77	82.28	▼ 17.49	102.38	86.29	▲ 16.09	▼ 1.40
Tue 2/28/2023	vs UMBC₂₂₁	L 70.33 - 72.70	L 67-70 (OT)	12-17	102.51	91.94	▼ 10.57	109.31	94.54	▲ 14.77	▲ 4.20
Sat 3/4/2023	@ UMBC₂₂₁	L 67.63 - 75.51	W 67-65	13-17	102.51	100.53	▼ 1.98	109.31	94.65	▲ 14.66	▲ 12.68
Tue 3/7/2023	@ Vermont₁₀₀	L 59.22 - 74.42	L 57-79	13-18	93.71	77.00	▼ 16.71	112.83	132.04	▼ 19.21	▼ 35.92
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Binghamton performs worse against squads that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint. When facing teams that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 58.82%, Binghamton is more efficient than normal 29% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 83% of the time.
	When playing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, Binghamton usually performs worse than average. Binghamton is more efficient than normal 35% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 36.54%. In all other contests, Binghamton performs better than average 75% of the time.
	Binghamton is typically worse vs. teams that convert well from outside the arc. Against foes that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.97%, Binghamton performs above their norm 27% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 67% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox