TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Miami (OH)  12-11 (0.522)  |  Mid-American
All-Play Percentage: 0.458 (194th)
Schedule Strength: 0.476 (194th)
Record Quality: 0.021 (164th)
Avg. Season Rank: 174.62 (175th)
Pace: 67.10 (307th)
Momentum: 3.35 (41st)
Off. Momentum: 0.99 (130th)
Def. Momentum: 2.36 (32nd)
Consistency: -9.76 (230th)
Res. Consistency: -14.56 (281st)
Away From Home: 1.19 (82nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -5.85 (341st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.13 22.40 76.77 84.95 42.78 33.25 36.83 27.19 39.74 24.50 54.23 7.66 11.82 4.77 39.15 32.01 28.85 2.10
RANK: 125th 268th 33rd 52nd 218th 96th 45th 65th 116th 304th 299th 336th 230th 182nd 134th 83rd 331st 295th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 105.19 22.66 -- 83.91 45.59 34.46 36.03 23.90 39.90 25.55 63.80 11.26 11.08 5.59 41.07 28.48 30.45 2.11
RANK: 290th 97th -- 267th 268th 324th 281st 216th 239th 70th 316th 189th 72nd 255th 313th 190th 53rd 34th

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but Miami (OH) should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. They are ranked #194 (out of 357) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 12-11. Of the 12 schools in the MAC (average ranking 193.1), they're currently ranked as our #8 team in the conference.

Based on the data, Miami (OH) will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 102 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #125 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. Miami (OH) does a really good job converting from the free throw line. Making 76.8% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked 33rd nationally in free throw percentage. Unfortunately, with a free throw attempt rate of just 22.40 vs. AO, they don't provide themselves a whole lot of opportunities at the foul line. Miami (OH) is also one of the more accurate teams in the college game when it comes to shooting the three. They're ranked 45th nationally in three-point field goal percentage and make about 36.8% of their attempts from there vs. AO.

Unfortunately, Miami (OH) is not even remotely close to being as good on defense as they are on offense. The team is ranked 290th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 105 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Miami (OH) is extremely underskilled to force steals that turn into quick and easy points. They're ranked #336 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 7.66 vs. AO. Miami (OH) has also done a pretty poor job this season to prevent opponents from making shots from the inside. The team is ranked 316th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 63.8% of their attempts from close-up.

Miami (OH) has been playing better basketball in their most recent outings, as evidenced by the team's #41 ranking in positive momentum.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Miami (OH) performs worse against squads that are typically efficient on offense. When facing teams that have an offensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 102.24, Miami (OH) is more efficient than normal 10% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 75% of the time.
When playing teams that convert well from outside the arc, Miami (OH) usually performs worse than average. Miami (OH) is more efficient than normal 23% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.10%. In all other contests, Miami (OH) performs better than average 78% of the time.
Miami (OH) is typically better vs. teams that allow more chances at the line. Against foes that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 23.17, Miami (OH) performs above their norm 78% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 23% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Mballa carries Buffalo over Miami (Ohio) 74-63 in MAC
(3/11/2021 8:28:55 PM) CLEVELAND (AP) — Josh Mballa had 23 points and and a career-tying 19 rebounds as second-seeded Buffalo beat seventh-seeded Miami (Ohio) 74-63 in the Mid-American Conference Tournament quarterfinals on Thursday.
Jackson triple-double leads Toledo past Miami (Ohio) 87-75
(2/16/2021 10:02:36 PM) TOLEDO, Ohio (AP) — Marreon Jackson had a triple-double with 18 points, a career-high 11 assists and 10 rebounds to lift Toledo to an 87-75 win over Miami (Ohio) on Tuesday night.
Jackson scores 25 to lead Akron over Miami (Ohio) 83-76
(2/12/2021 11:40:11 PM) OXFORD, Ohio (AP) — Loren Cristian Jackson had 25 points as Akron topped Miami (Ohio) 83-76 on Friday night.
Skogman, Graves lift Buffalo over Miami (Ohio) 88-64
(2/6/2021 4:37:39 PM) BUFFALO, N.Y. (AP) — David Skogman and Jayvon Graves scored 16 points apiece as Buffalo easily defeated Miami (Ohio) 88-64 on Saturday.
Grant lifts Miami (Ohio) past Bowling Green 96-77
(1/21/2021 8:34:35 PM) OXFORD, Ohio (AP) — Dae Dae Grant had a career-high 27 points as Miami (Ohio) defeated Bowling Green 96-77 on Thursday.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox