TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2017-18 Little Rock  7-25 (0.219)  |  Sun Belt
All-Play Percentage: 0.149 (298th)
Schedule Strength: 0.505 (154th)
Record Quality: -0.300 (308th)
Avg. Season Rank: 289.07 (291st)
Pace: 66.93 (329th)
Momentum: 0.33 (156th)
Off. Momentum: -0.09 (199th)
Def. Momentum: 0.42 (118th)
Consistency: -10.71 (329th)
Res. Consistency: -12.96 (263rd)
Away From Home: -0.43 (174th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.97 (182nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 2, 2018. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 91.30 21.57 61.38 81.44 42.32 27.95 32.63 21.02 32.63 32.47 56.94 8.19 13.93 6.26 34.33 25.81 39.87 1.94
RANK: 331st 322nd 349th 194th 257th 269th 303rd 225th 323rd 43rd 257th 313th 206th 204th 264th 232nd 38th 53rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.97 30.59 -- 80.22 44.34 33.20 36.43 19.26 37.86 27.76 58.30 9.50 14.81 6.78 41.38 24.01 34.61 2.07
RANK: 195th 316th -- 101st 155th 287th 240th 48th 206th 136th 107th 54th 195th 168th 312th 54th 155th 97th

ANALYSIS:
Little Rock presently has one of the below-average teams in college basketball. Ranked 298th overall (out of 351) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 7-25. They are also ranked by this site as the worst team (out of 12) in the Sun Belt (average ranking 181.5).

Little Rock has a very tough time coming by points on offense. Scoring about 91 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are woefully ranked #331 in offensive efficiency. Little Rock has had serious struggles making their free throws this year. Converting just 61.4% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #349 overall in free throw percentage. Little Rock also needs improvement when it comes to draining the mid-range shot. The team is ranked 323rd in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 32.6% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO.

Even though the team ranks considerably higher in defensive efficiency, Little Rock isn't a powerhouse on that end of the floor either. Allowing roughly 104 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #195 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Little Rock commits too many fouls, which leads to plentiful free throw attempts for the opposition. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 30.59 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #316 in the country in that category. Little Rock also does a pretty inadequate job to provide chances for themselves to score quickly off of steals. They're ranked #313 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 8.19 vs. AO.

Little Rock has been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked 329th overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Little Rock does better vs. clubs that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. When playing squads that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.29%, Little Rock performs above average 80% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 40% of the time.
Little Rock performs better against squads that do not defend well on the perimeter. When facing teams that have a defensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.27%, Little Rock is more efficient than normal 65% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 30% of the time.
When playing teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint, Little Rock usually performs better than average. Little Rock is more efficient than normal 78% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 61.83%. In all other contests, Little Rock performs better than average 43% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox