Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 Abil. Christian 13-17 (0.433) | WAC

All-Play Percentage: 0.475 (191^st)	Schedule Strength: 0.508 (123^rd)	Record Quality: -0.103 (230^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 200.28 (199^th)
Pace: 69.86 (62^nd)	Momentum: -0.67 (214^th)	Off. Momentum: 0.20 (200^th)	Def. Momentum: -0.87 (191^st)
Consistency: -8.42 (76^th)	Res. Consistency: -9.59 (34^th)	Away From Home: -1.22 (254^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: -1.59 (240^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

103.34

25.49

73.18

84.83

44.02

28.06

35.69

22.13

33.94

34.64

57.21

13.59

11.91

4.44

33.07

26.09

40.84

1.92

RANK:

157^th

165^th

134^th

171^st

169^th

287^th

84^th

242^nd

336^th

17^th

227^th

44^th

281^st

279^th

297^th

252^nd

20^th

24^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

104.56

30.06

75.63

48.58

26.56

36.83

21.32

38.15

27.74

67.86

8.38

10.73

5.50

35.12

28.20

36.68

1.98

RANK:

214^th

336^th

2^nd

357^th

24^th

317^th

71^st

196^th

99^th

363^rd

19^th

12^th

214^th

112^th

195^th

256^th

255^th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, Abil. Christian is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. They are ranked #191 (out of 363) in the most recent Haslametrics ratings and have a record of 13-17. They are also ranked by this site as the #10 team (out of 13) in the WAC (average ranking 162.2).

Based on the data, Abil. Christian will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 103 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #157 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. Abil. Christian allows very few breakaway opportunities for the opposition, which typically translates to fewer turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.38, which ranks #19 in the country. Abil. Christian will also routinely look to penetrate, pound the ball inside, and score from as short a distance as possible. The ball-club is 20th in the NCAA in ratio of near-proximity attempts to total field goal attempts. As far as converting those near-proximity shots goes, the team shoots 57.2% vs. AO, which falls somewhere in the middle of the pack of the rankings in that category. If Abil. Christian does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's inability to drain mid-range jumpers. The squad makes just 33.9% of their mid-range field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks 28th-worst in the nation.

Abil. Christian doesn't perform as well defensively as they do offensively. The team is ranked 214th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 105 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Abil. Christian allows opposing teams far too many easy chances from the floor, ranking in the bottom-50 in three of the four main defensive field goal shooting categories. AO will convert a healthy 36.8% of their three-pointers (317th in the nation), 67.9% of their near-proximity attempts (last), and 48.6% of their total shots from the field (seventh from the bottom). Abil. Christian also commits too many fouls, which leads to plentiful free throw attempts for the opposition. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 30.06 vs. AO, the squad is ranked #336 in the country in that category. If Abil. Christian does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to limit the number of shot attempts by the opposition. The team has a defensive field goal attempt rate of 75.63 vs. AO, which ranks second-best in college basketball.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Mon 11/7/2022	vs Jackson State₃₁₀	W 77.75 - 67.51	W 65-56	1-0	108.29	83.52	▼ 24.77	97.65	73.80	▲ 23.85	▼ 0.92
Fri 11/11/2022	@ Texas A&M₃₆	L 64.14 - 79.91	L 58-77	1-1	95.16	79.28	▼ 15.88	113.05	104.06	▲ 8.99	▼ 6.89
Tue 11/15/2022	vs McMurry	---	W 104-46	2-1	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Mon 11/21/2022	vs Wright State₁₉₈ *	W 77.38 - 76.90	L 61-77	2-2	104.67	79.73	▼ 24.94	103.97	101.37	▲ 2.60	▼ 22.34
Tue 11/22/2022	vs Weber State₂₁₁ *	W 69.42 - 68.44	L 67-77	2-3	102.30	95.71	▼ 6.59	100.71	109.61	▼ 8.90	▼ 15.49
Wed 11/23/2022	vs UC Riverside₁₃₈ *	L 71.53 - 74.36	L 65-76	2-4	102.97	90.28	▼ 12.69	107.03	109.75	▼ 2.72	▼ 15.41
Sun 11/27/2022	@ N. Arizona₂₂₂	L 74.74 - 75.57	W 92-82	3-4	108.42	135.34	▲ 26.92	105.20	113.94	▼ 8.74	▲ 18.18
Wed 11/30/2022	vs North American	---	W 93-46	4-4	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 12/3/2022	vs Arl Baptist	---	W 88-42	5-4	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Tue 12/6/2022	@ Kansas State₂₉	L 66.49 - 83.60	L 64-81	5-5	94.50	94.54	▲ 0.04	113.78	108.14	▲ 5.64	▲ 5.68
Sat 12/10/2022	vs Texas A&M-Comm.₃₀₈	W 77.50 - 67.56	W 83-64	6-5	110.91	121.81	▲ 10.90	100.59	97.16	▲ 3.43	▲ 14.33
Sat 12/17/2022	@ CSU Bakersfield₂₉₄	W 67.61 - 64.49	W 65-59	7-5	103.26	100.12	▼ 3.14	94.48	88.42	▲ 6.06	▲ 2.92
Wed 12/21/2022	vs Howard Payne	---	W 113-52	8-5	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Thu 12/29/2022	@ Stephen F. Austin₁₄₃	L 71.06 - 76.95	L 68-75	8-6	100.37	100.55	▲ 0.18	104.57	109.52	▼ 4.95	▼ 4.77
Sat 12/31/2022	vs Tarleton₁₅₀	W 70.73 - 69.90	W 69-63	9-6	99.86	92.52	▼ 7.34	102.80	87.14	▲ 15.66	▲ 8.32
Sat 1/7/2023	vs Southern Utah₁₂₇	L 76.81 - 78.23	L 72-74	9-7	102.48	95.29	▼ 7.19	107.96	102.00	▲ 5.96	▼ 1.23
Wed 1/11/2023	@ UT Rio Grande₂₃₅	W 78.25 - 78.02	L 86-103	9-8	107.56	100.77	▼ 6.79	102.43	112.46	▼ 10.03	▼ 16.82
Sat 1/14/2023	@ Tarleton₁₅₀	L 67.89 - 72.71	L 63-72	9-9	99.86	95.13	▼ 4.73	102.80	103.66	▼ 0.86	▼ 5.59
Wed 1/18/2023	@ Utah Valley₇₄	L 66.96 - 79.74	L 54-84	9-10	95.02	73.19	▼ 21.83	107.88	111.11	▼ 3.23	▼ 25.06
Sat 1/21/2023	vs UT Arlington₂₇₁	W 73.47 - 65.33	W 84-68	10-10	105.32	137.62	▲ 32.30	97.41	100.08	▼ 2.67	▲ 29.63
Thu 1/26/2023	vs Grand Canyon₁₂₈	L 72.06 - 73.30	L 73-75	10-11	104.47	103.79	▼ 0.68	108.90	110.70	▼ 1.80	▼ 2.48
Sat 1/28/2023	vs Utah Tech₁₅₈	W 75.93 - 74.55	W 81-76	11-11	102.88	98.93	▼ 3.95	104.80	97.90	▲ 6.90	▲ 2.95
Wed 2/1/2023	@ Seattle₁₅₆	L 69.98 - 74.48	W 83-68	12-11	100.42	120.57	▲ 20.15	102.68	96.55	▲ 6.13	▲ 26.28
Sat 2/4/2023	@ Cal Baptist₁₆₆	L 67.23 - 70.71	W 87-71	13-11	101.73	137.94	▲ 36.21	102.40	107.23	▼ 4.83	▲ 31.38
Sat 2/11/2023	vs Sam Houston₉₅	L 65.97 - 69.70	L 62-77	13-12	95.22	94.77	▼ 0.45	104.33	124.22	▼ 19.89	▼ 20.34
Fri 2/17/2023	@ Grand Canyon₁₂₈	L 69.29 - 76.09	L 84-94	13-13	104.47	126.91	▲ 22.44	108.90	132.28	▼ 23.38	▼ 0.94
Wed 2/22/2023	vs Stephen F. Austin₁₄₃	L 74.01 - 74.02	L 89-91 (2OT)	13-14	100.37	104.76	▲ 4.39	104.57	108.76	▼ 4.19	▲ 0.20
Sat 2/25/2023	vs Utah Valley₇₄	L 69.89 - 76.77	L 62-66	13-15	95.02	85.32	▼ 9.70	107.88	93.67	▲ 14.21	▲ 4.51
Fri 3/3/2023	@ Sam Houston₉₅	L 63.20 - 72.43	L 54-72	13-16	95.22	84.54	▼ 10.68	104.33	105.81	▼ 1.48	▼ 12.16
Tue 3/7/2023	vs Cal Baptist₁₆₆ *	L 68.61 - 69.38	L 62-69	13-17	101.73	84.64	▼ 17.09	102.40	93.24	▲ 9.16	▼ 7.93
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	Abil. Christian performs worse against squads that shoot the ball well from the field. When facing teams that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 43.15%, Abil. Christian is more efficient than normal 28% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 75% of the time.
	When playing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, Abil. Christian usually performs worse than average. Abil. Christian is more efficient than normal 28% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.51%. In all other contests, Abil. Christian performs better than average 75% of the time.
	Abil. Christian is typically worse vs. teams that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. Against foes that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.69%, Abil. Christian performs above their norm 13% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 56% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox