TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Bowling Green  14-12 (0.538)  |  Mid-American
All-Play Percentage: 0.539 (165th)
Schedule Strength: 0.501 (176th)
Record Quality: 0.049 (146th)
Avg. Season Rank: 166.38 (163rd)
Pace: 71.36 (91st)
Momentum: 1.66 (99th)
Off. Momentum: -0.64 (245th)
Def. Momentum: 2.30 (36th)
Consistency: -10.80 (311th)
Res. Consistency: -17.71 (336th)
Away From Home: 4.72 (1st)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.52 (228th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.24 26.43 74.10 87.88 40.85 34.02 31.91 23.28 35.14 30.58 55.14 12.56 15.50 4.96 38.71 26.49 34.80 2.04
RANK: 124th 111th 81st 11th 294th 71st 271st 173rd 277th 71st 269th 91st 53rd 163rd 148th 227th 155th 192nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.68 23.34 -- 83.27 45.05 32.34 33.23 21.27 41.67 29.67 60.36 9.20 13.68 4.80 38.84 25.54 35.63 2.03
RANK: 230th 119th -- 220th 242nd 256th 141st 98th 285th 243rd 234th 54th 242nd 157th 248th 77th 233rd 173rd

ANALYSIS:
Bowling Green is a fairly decent basketball team that, while likely better than average, isn't quite good enough to crack any top-25 rankings this year. Their record this season is 14-12, and the club is ranked 165th overall (out of 357) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #6 team (out of 12) in the MAC (average ranking 193.1).

Based on the data, Bowling Green will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 102 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #124 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. Bowling Green is one of the very best when it comes to maximizing field goal opportunities. The team is ranked 11th in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 87.88 vs. AO. Conversely, the squad isn't all that good at draining those shots, converting about 40.8% of their total attempts vs. AO. Bowling Green also does an adequate job of creating chances for themselves off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 15.50 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked 53rd in the NCAA).

The defense for Bowling Green, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the offense is. The team is ranked 230th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 103 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Bowling Green hasn't done terribly well defending the mid-range jumper. The squad is ranked 285th nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 41.7% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor.

Bowling Green has been one of the more erratic teams in NCAA basketball this year (presently ranked 311th in the country in consistency), which makes forecasting the outcomes of their upcoming games tougher than most. When playing on the road, Bowling Green has played their best basketball this season. The team is currently ranked first in the country in the away-from-home metric our site tracks.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that prefer the outside shot, Bowling Green often performs worse than normal. Bowling Green is more efficient than usual 23% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive shooting proximity score vs. AO greater than 2.02. In their other contests, Bowling Green performs better than the norm 75% of the time.
Bowling Green does worse vs. clubs that convert well from the charity stripe. When playing squads that have an adjusted free throw percentage vs. AO greater than 0.69%, Bowling Green performs above average 35% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 75% of the time.
Bowling Green performs better against squads that allow more chances at the line. When facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 23.16, Bowling Green is more efficient than normal 70% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 33% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Turner lifts Bowling Green over Ball St. 75-62
(2/16/2021 9:58:40 PM) MUNCIE, Ind. (AP) — Justin Turner had 27 points as Bowling Green topped Ball State 75-62 on Tuesday night. Kaden Metheny added 21 points for the Falcons.
Pippen lifts Kent St. past Bowling Green 71-67
(2/9/2021 10:01:56 PM) BOWLING GREEN, Ohio (AP) — Danny Pippen had 16 points and 11 rebounds to carry Kent State to a 71-67 win over Bowling Green on Tuesday night.
Freeman leads Akron over Bowling Green 69-57
(1/19/2021 9:42:29 PM) BOWLING GREEN, Ohio (AP) — Enrique Freeman scored 10 points and grabbed 14 rebounds to lift Akron to a 69-57 win over Bowling Green on Tuesday night.
Turner scores 25 to lead Bowling Green over Buffalo 76-69
(1/15/2021 10:14:02 PM) BUFFALO, N.Y. (AP) — Justin Turner had 25 points as Bowling Green beat Buffalo 76-69 on Friday night.
Turner carries Bowling Green past Central Michigan 93-65
(1/9/2021 8:13:26 PM) MOUNT PLEASANT, Mich. (AP) — Justin Turner had 24 points with eight assists as Bowling Green romped past Central Michigan 93-65 on Saturday, posting a 5-0 start to Mid-American Conference play for just the third time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox