Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 Bowling Green 16-18 (0.471) | Mid-American

All-Play Percentage: 0.320 (238^th)	Schedule Strength: 0.480 (193^rd)	Record Quality: -0.065 (201^st)	Avg. Season Rank: 216.37 (217^th)
Pace: 70.36 (135^th)	Momentum: -1.26 (228^th)	Off. Momentum: 1.12 (132^nd)	Def. Momentum: -2.38 (283^rd)
Consistency: -8.68 (141^st)	Res. Consistency: -12.00 (213^th)	Away From Home: 0.83 (91^st)	Paper Tiger Factor: -2.54 (286^th)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

96.99

30.28

65.65

79.94

43.15

23.13

35.15

23.19

32.07

33.62

56.29

11.57

16.70

7.68

28.93

29.01

42.06

1.87

RANK:

244^th

105^th

318^th

270^th

192^nd

330^th

154^th

206^th

315^th

28^th

252^nd

122^nd

82^nd

86^th

321^st

194^th

16^th

13^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

104.36

29.57

82.07

44.43

29.81

37.65

22.65

36.50

29.60

57.31

11.35

15.08

6.82

36.33

27.60

36.07

2.00

RANK:

208^th

203^rd

170^th

192^nd

227^th

303^rd

118^th

189^th

204^th

110^th

218^th

182^nd

171^st

225^th

121^st

217^th

167^th

ANALYSIS:
While not an atrocious team by any means, Bowling Green is not exactly one that should appear in many top-100 rankings either. Their record this season is 16-18, and the club is ranked 238th overall (out of 351) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. They are also ranked by this site as the #11 team (out of 12) in the MAC (average ranking 168.1).

Though their offense is far from the worst in the game, Bowling Green is not terribly gifted on that end of the court either. Scoring about 97 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked at #244 in offensive efficiency. Bowling Green is not one of the better teams when it comes to sinking foul shots. Converting just 65.7% of their attempts, the squad is ranked #318 overall in free throw percentage. Bowling Green also needs improvement when it comes to draining the mid-range shot. The team is ranked 315th in field goal percentage from that distance, making only 32.1% of their mid-range attempts vs. AO.

Bowling Green doesn't rate much better on defense than they do on offense. Allowing roughly 104 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #208 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Bowling Green does a very lackluster job preventing opponents from draining threes. They rank 303rd nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 37.7% of their attempts from afar.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Sat 11/14/2015	vs New Orleans₃₁₄	W 77.87 - 67.33	W 79-61	1-0	102.42	98.49	▼ 3.93	94.22	75.38	▲ 18.84	▲ 14.91
Wed 11/18/2015	vs Cincinnati₂₉	L 60.63 - 73.67	L 50-83	1-1	87.37	74.01	▼ 13.36	111.54	116.76	▼ 5.22	▼ 18.58
Sat 11/21/2015	vs North Dakota₂₄₉ *	W 71.90 - 71.18	L 59-77	1-2	98.38	75.64	▼ 22.74	97.41	94.94	▲ 2.47	▼ 20.27
Sun 11/22/2015	vs Youngstown St.₂₉₇ *	W 79.32 - 74.65	W 79-72	2-2	107.54	103.95	▼ 3.59	101.57	93.33	▲ 8.24	▲ 4.65
Mon 11/23/2015	@ FGCU₁₇₆	L 64.85 - 72.67	W 82-77	3-2	96.17	120.06	▲ 23.89	102.30	108.68	▼ 6.38	▲ 17.51
Sun 11/29/2015	vs Urbana	---	W 96-55	4-2	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Wed 12/2/2015	vs UMBC₃₁₅	W 79.86 - 69.46	W 72-64	5-2	108.71	98.49	▼ 10.22	100.27	93.06	▲ 7.21	▼ 3.01
Sat 12/5/2015	vs Drake₂₅₉	W 72.83 - 67.60	W 75-63	6-2	103.78	106.04	▲ 2.26	102.37	92.47	▲ 9.90	▲ 12.16
Tue 12/8/2015	@ SE Missouri St.₃₃₄	W 73.41 - 68.55	W 79-52	7-2	103.02	128.37	▲ 25.35	91.34	83.62	▲ 7.72	▲ 33.07
Sat 12/12/2015	@ Detroit Mercy₁₈₁	L 75.01 - 83.41	L 80-95	7-3	102.99	108.32	▲ 5.33	108.39	121.08	▼ 12.69	▼ 7.36
Sun 12/20/2015	@ Wright State₁₄₉	L 61.32 - 70.79	L 47-83	7-4	92.53	71.44	▼ 21.09	101.19	113.45	▼ 12.26	▼ 33.35
Wed 12/23/2015	@ Cleveland State₃₀₀	W 64.29 - 63.62	W 62-47	8-4	98.70	99.53	▲ 0.83	92.54	68.27	▲ 24.27	▲ 25.10
Sat 1/2/2016	vs Oakland City	---	W 87-56	9-4	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Wed 1/6/2016	vs Miami (OH)₂₄₁	W 66.90 - 62.98	W 73-62	10-4	96.75	97.08	▲ 0.33	97.17	86.25	▲ 10.92	▲ 11.25
Sat 1/9/2016	vs Cent. Michigan₁₅₅	L 72.67 - 73.96	L 67-79	10-5	102.76	98.60	▼ 4.16	110.46	122.61	▼ 12.15	▼ 16.31
Tue 1/12/2016	@ Ohio₁₃₆	L 69.53 - 80.43	W 91-75	11-5	99.46	129.39	▲ 29.93	109.11	101.56	▲ 7.55	▲ 37.48
Sat 1/16/2016	@ E. Michigan₁₅₇	L 68.84 - 78.44	W 84-79	12-5	98.27	114.92	▲ 16.65	105.82	101.03	▲ 4.79	▲ 21.44
Tue 1/19/2016	vs Toledo₁₁₉	L 70.93 - 75.20	L 74-81	12-6	97.54	99.87	▲ 2.33	109.38	114.44	▼ 5.06	▼ 2.73
Sat 1/23/2016	vs Kent State₁₈₃	W 71.80 - 71.62	L 59-62	12-7	99.80	82.59	▼ 17.21	105.20	95.45	▲ 9.75	▼ 7.46
Tue 1/26/2016	@ W. Michigan₁₉₁	L 67.22 - 74.20	W 79-78	13-7	99.04	111.14	▲ 12.10	102.94	101.08	▲ 1.86	▲ 13.96
Sat 1/30/2016	@ Cent. Michigan₁₅₅	L 68.89 - 77.98	L 65-77	13-8	102.76	93.42	▼ 9.34	110.46	105.32	▲ 5.14	▼ 4.20
Tue 2/2/2016	vs Ball State₁₇₈	W 67.24 - 67.23	L 64-72	13-9	95.90	97.08	▲ 1.18	101.54	112.01	▼ 10.47	▼ 9.29
Sat 2/6/2016	@ Miami (OH)₂₄₁	L 63.21 - 66.82	L 51-55	13-10	96.75	76.83	▼ 19.92	97.17	76.79	▲ 20.38	▲ 0.46
Tue 2/9/2016	vs Akron₉₈	L 67.74 - 74.29	L 68-83	13-11	95.24	92.73	▼ 2.51	110.16	118.86	▼ 8.70	▼ 11.21
Sat 2/13/2016	vs W. Michigan₁₉₁	W 71.06 - 70.20	L 68-74	13-12	99.04	90.23	▼ 8.81	102.94	104.29	▼ 1.35	▼ 10.16
Tue 2/16/2016	@ N. Illinois₁₇₃	L 65.05 - 73.01	L 60-71	13-13	95.13	87.77	▼ 7.36	101.73	104.66	▼ 2.93	▼ 10.29
Sat 2/20/2016	@ Buffalo₁₄₈	L 69.14 - 79.29	L 74-88	13-14	96.33	100.18	▲ 3.85	104.33	112.15	▼ 7.82	▼ 3.97
Tue 2/23/2016	vs Ohio₁₃₆	L 73.48 - 76.24	W 87-82	14-14	99.46	125.02	▲ 25.56	109.11	120.06	▼ 10.95	▲ 14.61
Fri 2/26/2016	@ Akron₉₈	L 63.95 - 78.19	L 54-89	14-15	95.24	81.10	▼ 14.14	110.16	127.44	▼ 17.28	▼ 31.42
Tue 3/1/2016	@ Kent State₁₈₃	L 67.95 - 75.49	L 54-70	14-16	99.80	81.04	▼ 18.76	105.20	105.02	▲ 0.18	▼ 18.58
Fri 3/4/2016	vs Buffalo₁₄₈	L 73.19 - 75.10	L 83-87	14-17	96.33	106.29	▲ 9.96	104.33	118.92	▼ 14.59	▼ 4.63
Mon 3/7/2016	@ Kent State₁₈₃	L 67.95 - 75.49	W 70-69	15-17	99.80	115.82	▲ 16.02	105.20	110.20	▼ 5.00	▲ 11.02
Thu 3/10/2016	vs Cent. Michigan₁₅₅ *	L 70.78 - 75.97	W 62-59	16-17	102.76	98.41	▼ 4.35	110.46	95.16	▲ 15.30	▲ 10.95
Fri 3/11/2016	vs Akron₉₈ *	L 65.85 - 76.24	L 66-80	16-18	95.24	96.97	▲ 1.73	110.16	118.18	▼ 8.02	▼ 6.29
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	When facing teams that aren't terribly skilled defensively, Bowling Green often performs better than normal. Bowling Green is more efficient than usual 65% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive efficiency rating vs. AO greater than 102.74. In their other contests, Bowling Green performs better than the norm 8% of the time.
	Bowling Green does better vs. clubs that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. When playing squads that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 7.38%, Bowling Green performs above average 80% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 27% of the time.
	Bowling Green performs worse against squads that convert well from outside the arc. When facing teams that have an offensive three-point field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 33.10%, Bowling Green is more efficient than normal 25% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 75% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox