TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Cornell  15-11 (0.577)  |  Ivy
All-Play Percentage: 0.473 (189th)
Schedule Strength: 0.397 (209th)
Record Quality: 0.012 (173rd)
Avg. Season Rank: 201.47 (207th)
Pace: 73.71 (4th)
Momentum: -0.11 (182nd)
Off. Momentum: -1.26 (268th)
Def. Momentum: 1.15 (85th)
Consistency: -7.80 (25th)
Res. Consistency: -7.39 (3rd)
Away From Home: -0.70 (265th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.79 (161st)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 101.25 25.50 70.90 79.25 44.46 37.37 34.00 12.82 40.52 29.06 59.64 13.56 8.79 3.34 47.16 16.18 36.66 2.10
RANK: 161st 109th 199th 341st 125th 25th 158th 358th 63rd 170th 139th 57th 350th 328th 8th 355th 101st 310th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.06 27.04 -- 81.96 44.93 30.84 32.08 20.99 42.68 30.13 59.65 11.97 13.94 6.54 37.63 25.61 36.76 2.01
RANK: 208th 299th -- 97th 235th 158th 86th 76th 334th 243rd 202nd 250th 222nd 329th 185th 88th 273rd 234th

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but Cornell should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. Ranked 189th overall (out of 358) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 15-11. Of the eight schools in the Ivy League (average ranking 208.5), they're currently ranked as our #3 team in the conference.

If there is a strength for Cornell this year, it's probably on the offensive end of the court. While favoring one of the game's most blistering paces (the fourth-fastest in D1), the team is rated 161st in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 101 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Cornell lives and dies by the three-ball and will launch from long-distance early and often. The team ranks eighth in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. When it comes to actually making their three-point attempts, the squad shoots a so-so 34.0% from beyond the arc vs. AO. Cornell also does fairly solid work converting shots between the three-point stripe and the low post. The squad is ranked 63rd nationally in mid-range field goal percentage, making about 40.5% of their attempts from those locations vs. AO. If Cornell does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties obtaining second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad only has a rating of 8.79 vs. AO in potential points off of second chances, which ranks ninth-worst in college hoops.

Cornell is not quite as good on the defensive end of the floor. The team is ranked 208th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 102 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Cornell performs really badly when attempting to stop opponents from making mid-range jumpers. The squad is ranked 334th nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 42.7% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. Cornell also gives up too many chances to easily score off of offensive rebounds. The team allows AO to convert 6.5% of all second-chance opportunities (329th nationally).

Cornell is one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked 25th in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, Cornell usually performs worse than average. Cornell is more efficient than normal 33% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 38.64%. In all other contests, Cornell performs better than average 73% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Princeton gets past Cornell 77-73 in Ivy League semifinal
(3/12/2022 2:39:15 PM) BOSTON (AP) — Jaelin Llewellyn scored 23 points and Tosan Evbuomwan added 21 points as Princeton narrowly beat Cornell 77-73 in the semifinals of the ...
Kirkwood leads Harvard past Cornell 77-72 in OT
(2/19/2022 10:19:44 PM) BOSTON (AP) — Noah Kirkwood had a career-high 31 points and Harvard beat Cornell 77-72 in overtime on Saturday night.
Adelekun, Rai lift Dartmouth past Cornell 71-59
(2/18/2022 10:21:48 PM) HANOVER, N.H. (AP) — Dame Adelekun had 19 points and eight rebounds and Aaryn Rai had 12 points and 10 rebounds to carry Dartmouth to a 71-59 win over...
Manon scores 22 to lift Cornell past Princeton 88-83
(2/4/2022 10:44:44 PM) ITHACA, N.Y. (AP) — Chris Manon had a season-high 22 points as Cornell stretched its home winning streak to eight games, narrowly defeating Princeton ...
Dickson beats buzzer, Noll nets 16 Cornell nips Brown 74-72
(1/30/2022 2:27:15 PM) PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP) — Dean Noll registered 16 points and seven rebounds and Kobe Dickson’s putback with 0.1 seconds left gave Cornell a 74-72 win o...
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox