TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2014-15 Columbia  13-15 (0.464)  |  Ivy
All-Play Percentage: 0.511 (171st)
Schedule Strength: 0.451 (215th)
Record Quality: -0.078 (214th)
Avg. Season Rank: 155.55 (152nd)
Pace: 61.77 (338th)
Momentum: -2.46 (286th)
Off. Momentum: 1.22 (133rd)
Def. Momentum: -3.68 (323rd)
Consistency: -12.66 (351st)
Res. Consistency: -15.03 (329th)
Away From Home: 1.81 (22nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.56 (152nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 6, 2015. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.97 21.77 68.63 83.70 43.23 38.61 35.39 13.72 37.64 31.37 55.32 7.63 14.81 7.79 46.13 16.39 37.48 2.09
RANK: 151st 349th 198th 94th 154th 4th 123rd 351st 71st 59th 256th 344th 198th 68th 4th 351st 71st 323rd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 103.33 29.56 -- 85.15 43.54 25.23 33.44 24.56 38.75 35.36 54.08 11.40 16.14 7.75 29.63 28.84 41.53 1.88
RANK: 211th 196th -- 304th 175th 63rd 105th 139th 303rd 343rd 49th 167th 247th 263rd 34th 102nd 335th 332nd

ANALYSIS:
They may not cause sleepless nights for opponents, but Columbia, as a slightly above-average team, cannot be totally ignored. Carrying a record of 13-15, they are currently rated #171 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. They are also ranked by this site as the #4 team (out of eight) in the Ivy League (average ranking 183.0).

If there is a strength for Columbia this year, it's probably on the offensive end of the court. While favoring a more deliberate, half-court style of play (the 14th-slowest pace in D1), the team is rated 151st in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 100 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Columbia lives and dies by the three-ball and will launch from long-distance early and often. The team ranks fourth in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. When it comes to actually making their three-point attempts, the squad shoots a so-so 35.4% from beyond the arc vs. AO. Columbia also does a pretty solid job of scoring points off of offensive rebounds. Against AO, the team successfully converts 7.8% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 68th nationally). If Columbia does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's inability to get to the free throw line. The squad has a free throw attempt rate of only 21.77 vs. AO, which ranks third-worst in the country.

Columbia doesn't perform as well defensively as they do offensively. The team is ranked 211th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 103 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Columbia is extremely underskilled to force steals that turn into quick and easy points. They're ranked #344 in potential points off of breakaway steals with a rating of only 7.63 vs. AO. Columbia also struggles on occasion to deny opponents opportunities to shoot from the floor. The team is ranked 304th in the nation in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 85.15 vs. AO. If Columbia does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their success stopping opponents from converting from locations near the basket. AO will convert just 54.1% of their near-proximity field goal attempts, and the team ranks 49th-best in the country in that category as a result.

Columbia has been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked last overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict. When playing on the road, Columbia has played their best basketball this season. The team is currently ranked 22nd in the country in the away-from-home metric our site tracks.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Columbia is typically better vs. teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. Against foes that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 34.73%, Columbia performs above their norm 73% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 33% of the time.
When facing teams that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities, Columbia often performs worse than normal. Columbia is more efficient than usual 40% of the time when facing teams that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 8.84. In their other contests, Columbia performs better than the norm 75% of the time.
Columbia does better vs. clubs that allow a greater number of field goal opportunities. When playing squads that have a defensive field goal attempt rate vs. AO greater than 80.83, Columbia performs above average 67% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 33% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox