TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Rutgers  18-14 (0.563)  |  Big Ten
All-Play Percentage: 0.801 (73rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.656 (54th)
Record Quality: 0.224 (72nd)
Avg. Season Rank: 96.73 (100th)
Pace: 67.42 (255th)
Momentum: -0.08 (181st)
Off. Momentum: 1.69 (103rd)
Def. Momentum: -1.77 (256th)
Consistency: -11.21 (344th)
Res. Consistency: -13.89 (298th)
Away From Home: -1.02 (297th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 3.44 (2nd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.13 24.53 71.21 83.37 46.19 27.58 34.92 26.91 37.93 28.88 64.67 12.61 14.99 5.36 33.08 32.28 34.64 1.98
RANK: 102nd 150th 188th 199th 56th 288th 113th 70th 164th 180th 33rd 82nd 81st 120th 285th 63rd 166th 98th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 93.81 21.71 -- 83.90 40.04 32.66 32.93 23.53 32.76 27.72 54.58 10.35 13.59 4.42 38.92 28.04 33.04 2.06
RANK: 50th 80th -- 192nd 39th 241st 129th 190th 19th 129th 53rd 111th 201st 113th 229th 189th 118th 109th

ANALYSIS:
Rutgers has been extremely effective at times this year and should be regarded as a serious opponent. Ranked 73rd overall (out of 358) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 18-14. They are also ranked by this site as the #9 team (out of 14) in the Big Ten (average ranking 52.3).

The primary strength for Rutgers is defense. The team is ranked 50th in efficiency, allowing fewer than 94 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Rutgers does a bang-up job preventing the opposition from draining jumpers in between the three-point line and the low post. They're ranked 19th in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 32.8% of their attempts from that distance. Rutgers also boasts one of the better overall defensive field goal percentages in the country. The team ranks #39 nationally in field goal percentage allowed, as AO only makes good on about 40.0% of their total attempts from the floor.

Rutgers is also a fairly decent team on the offensive end of the court. The team ranks 102nd nationally in offensive efficiency, scoring about 104 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Rutgers has the potential to make you pay if you let them get close to the rim. The team is ranked 33rd in the country in near-proximity field goal percentage, making approximately 64.7% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. Rutgers has also been fairly successful when shooting from the field. The squad is ranked 56th in the country in field goal percentage, making approximately 46.2% of their attempts vs. AO.

Rutgers has been one of the most erratic teams in college basketball this year (currently ranked 344th overall in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their future games far more difficult to predict.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Rutgers is typically better vs. teams that shoot the ball well from the field. Against foes that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 45.69%, Rutgers performs above their norm 73% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 29% of the time.
When facing teams that find ways to get to the free throw line, Rutgers often performs better than normal. Rutgers is more efficient than usual 64% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 23.47. In their other contests, Rutgers performs better than the norm 20% of the time.
Rutgers does better vs. clubs that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When playing squads that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 59.54%, Rutgers performs above average 64% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 20% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
BUBBLE WATCH: Tar Heels solidify NCAA spot, Hoosiers slide
(3/6/2022 9:48:21 PM) Two games involving two of college basketball’s bluest bluebloods left North Carolina and Indiana heading into conference tournament week on opposite ...
Unfinished Business: 4 Thoughts on Rutgers 59-58 Win Over Penn State - On the Banks
(3/6/2022 3:59:06 PM) Rutgers grinded one out—one that you originally thought was going to be a laugher—here on senior day. Four Thoughts: Nothing Comes Easy For These Guys: It looked like they were going to cruise....
Ron Harper Jr. scores 15, Rutgers holds off Penn State 59-58
(3/6/2022 2:40:14 PM) PISCATAWAY, N.J. (AP) — Senior Ron Harper Jr. scored 15 points and hit a go-ahead free throw with 1:41 to play as Rutgers edged Penn State 59-58 after...
Rutgers avoids disaster in outlasting Penn State with March Madness 2022 berth likely
(3/6/2022 2:31:42 PM) Of course Rutgers didn't make it easy. Of course the Scarlet Knights had to rely on their grit and a last-second defensive stand that nearly gave their fans a heart attack.
Rutgers basketball: He's driving 1,000 miles to see his 1st game in 40 years
(3/6/2022 5:00:13 AM) Mark Strobin last set foot in the RAC as a grad student in 1982. He's come home to be part of something special today.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox