TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Princeton  24-5 (0.828)  |  Ivy
All-Play Percentage: 0.801 (73rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.465 (144th)
Record Quality: 0.330 (38th)
Avg. Season Rank: 55.85 (52nd)
Pace: 65.78 (313th)
Momentum: -3.48 (303rd)
Off. Momentum: -0.02 (198th)
Def. Momentum: -3.45 (332nd)
Consistency: -8.21 (55th)
Res. Consistency: -8.91 (8th)
Away From Home: 0.98 (72nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.42 (124th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 115.31 25.32 79.95 88.04 45.63 41.81 35.23 16.41 40.87 29.82 62.82 8.61 9.51 2.92 47.49 18.64 33.87 2.14
RANK: 33rd 227th 4th 57th 102nd 3rd 131st 339th 99th 229th 52nd 327th 345th 360th 5th 344th 257th 352nd

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 104.06 22.22 -- 86.36 44.91 31.03 33.15 24.52 39.39 30.81 61.13 9.07 12.57 5.10 35.93 28.39 35.68 2.00
RANK: 146th 29th -- 221st 216th 159th 111th 251st 206th 175th 299th 31st 105th 122nd 135th 249th 159th 196th

ANALYSIS:
Princeton has a fairly solid squad that likely falls within the top quartile of all teams in college basketball this year. Ranked 73rd overall (out of 362) in our most recent ratings, they presently have a record of 24-5. They are also ranked by this site as the best team (out of eight) in the Ivy League (average ranking 186.8).

The primary strength for Princeton this year is offense. The team is ranked 33rd in efficiency on that end of the floor, and they'll rack up more than 115 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO. Princeton is deadly accurate at the free throw line. Making 79.9% of their attempts from the stripe, they are ranked fourth nationally in free throw percentage. Princeton also lives and dies by the three-ball and will launch from long-distance early and often. The team ranks fifth in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. When it comes to actually making their three-point attempts, the squad shoots a so-so 35.2% from beyond the arc vs. AO. If Princeton does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's difficulties obtaining and converting second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad has a second-chance conversion percentage of just 2.9% vs. AO, which ranks third-worst in the nation.

Though they're not quite as efficient defensively as they are offensively, Princeton still does OK when the opposition has possession of the ball. The team ranks 146th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 104 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Princeton does a pretty solid job avoiding careless fouls and minimizing opponents' opportunities from the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 22.22 vs. AO, they are currently rated 29th in the country in that category. If Princeton does exhibit a weakness on the defensive end of the floor, it'd likely be the team's unwillingness to take risks in order to score fast points off of the opposition's turnovers. The squad only has a rating of 8.61 in potential points scored off of steals vs. AO, which ranks 36th-worst in the college game.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Princeton performs worse against squads that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. When facing teams that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 38.04%, Princeton is more efficient than normal 39% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 89% of the time.
When playing teams that fail to defend efficiently inside the paint, Princeton usually performs worse than average. Princeton is more efficient than normal 39% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 56.62%. In all other contests, Princeton performs better than average 89% of the time.
Princeton is typically worse vs. teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field. Against foes that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 42.90%, Princeton performs above their norm 38% of the time. Against the remaining opposition, the team performs above average 82% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox