Haslametrics.com

Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 Dartmouth 10-18 (0.357) | Ivy

All-Play Percentage: 0.340 (232^nd)	Schedule Strength: 0.442 (220^th)	Record Quality: -0.224 (284^th)	Avg. Season Rank: 248.95 (251^st)
Pace: 69.52 (183^rd)	Momentum: 1.90 (84^th)	Off. Momentum: 1.78 (97^th)	Def. Momentum: 0.12 (138^th)
Consistency: -7.32 (13^th)	Res. Consistency: -11.26 (155^th)	Away From Home: -0.24 (200^th)	Paper Tiger Factor: 0.43 (72^nd)

NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.

OFFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

96.65

30.38

72.21

79.11

41.80

25.07

34.22

25.77

36.07

28.27

53.75

11.47

16.11

6.58

31.69

32.57

35.73

1.96

RANK:

253^rd

102^nd

90^th

303^rd

259^th

289^th

206^th

116^th

136^th

200^th

306^th

128^th

113^th

177^th

267^th

86^th

145^th

96^th

DEFENSE

Eff

FTAR

FT%

FGAR

FG%

3PAR

3P%

MRAR

MR%

NPAR

NP%

PPSt

PPSC

SCC%

%3PA

%MRA

%NPA

Prox

RATING:

102.94

31.03

78.49

45.84

28.89

35.16

25.79

40.78

23.81

64.27

13.02

13.27

6.70

36.81

32.85

30.34

2.06

RANK:

179^th

256^th

45^th

261^st

180^th

186^th

255^th

332^nd

17^th

305^th

320^th

64^th

158^th

244^th

292^nd

30^th

52^nd

ANALYSIS:
They're far from the worst of the worst, but Dartmouth should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. They have a record of 10-18 and are ranked 232nd overall (out of 351) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the eight schools in the Ivy League (average ranking 180.1), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference.

Dartmouth is not one of the most productive teams on offense. Scoring fewer than 97 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are rated at #253 in offensive efficiency. Dartmouth has some difficulty protecting the ball efficiently when in possession, which leads to some quick and easy baskets for the opposition. The team's rating for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals vs. AO is 13.02, which ranks 320th in D1. Dartmouth also won't provide opponents much of a scare with their shooting percentage from the inside. The team is ranked 306th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 53.7% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO.

Though they rate better on defense than they do on offense, Dartmouth still isn't one of the more capable defensive teams in college hoops. Allowing roughly 103 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO, they are ranked #179 in the nation in defensive efficiency. Dartmouth performs really badly when attempting to stop opponents from making mid-range jumpers. The squad is ranked 332nd nationally in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on 40.8% of their attempts from those in-between spots on the floor. Dartmouth has also done a pretty poor job this season to prevent opponents from making shots from the inside. The team is ranked 305th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 64.3% of their attempts from close-up. On a positive note, AO will take nowhere near as many inside shots as they typically would and, as a result, only 30.3% of AO's field goal attempts will come from short-distance. If Dartmouth does have a bright spot on defense, it would have to be their ability to limit the number of shot attempts by the opposition. The team has a defensive field goal attempt rate of 78.49 vs. AO, which ranks 45th-best in college basketball.

Dartmouth is one of the most consistent teams in NCAA basketball (currently ranked 13th in consistency), which makes the outcomes of their upcoming games far easier to predict.

SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:


					ADJ. OFF. EFFICIENCY			ADJ. DEF. EFFICIENCY
Date	Opponent	Should	Did	Record	Should	Did	Diff.	Should	Did	Diff.	Rating
Fri 11/13/2015	@ Seton Hall₃₄	L 59.22 - 79.95	L 67-84	0-1	85.98	94.70	▲ 8.72	108.95	110.97	▼ 2.02	▲ 6.70
Tue 11/17/2015	@ Marist₃₁₉	W 73.38 - 70.40	L 63-73	0-2	108.90	85.35	▼ 23.55	99.42	95.73	▲ 3.69	▼ 19.86
Sun 11/29/2015	vs LIU Brooklyn₂₇₅	W 77.56 - 70.04	W 79-56	1-2	102.76	115.42	▲ 12.66	98.61	84.88	▲ 13.73	▲ 26.39
Wed 12/2/2015	vs Vermont₁₄₇	L 70.68 - 71.93	L 63-68	1-3	99.74	92.54	▼ 7.20	107.70	105.95	▲ 1.75	▼ 5.45
Sat 12/5/2015	vs Hartford₃₂₃	W 78.07 - 66.18	W 74-65	2-3	107.97	99.90	▼ 8.07	97.84	90.06	▲ 7.78	▼ 0.29
Wed 12/9/2015	@ Maine₃₃₃	W 79.61 - 74.07	W 79-69	3-3	105.85	111.34	▲ 5.49	93.73	92.66	▲ 1.07	▲ 6.56
Sat 12/12/2015	@ Stanford₁₀₈	L 61.09 - 73.74	L 50-64	3-4	94.15	88.37	▼ 5.78	107.00	111.37	▼ 4.37	▼ 10.15
Mon 12/14/2015	@ CSU Bakersfield₁₁₁	L 59.80 - 72.24	L 62-69	3-5	89.30	84.86	▼ 4.44	101.39	90.23	▲ 11.16	▲ 6.72
Sat 12/19/2015	@ UNH₂₂₈	L 66.47 - 70.50	L 56-76	3-6	99.98	80.64	▼ 19.34	99.92	103.68	▼ 3.76	▼ 23.10
Tue 12/22/2015	vs Longwood₂₈₆	W 75.61 - 67.38	W 78-54	4-6	103.27	113.48	▲ 10.21	97.76	85.97	▲ 11.79	▲ 22.00
Thu 12/31/2015	vs Bryant₃₃₇	W 75.37 - 62.18	L 60-62	4-7	106.13	95.44	▼ 10.69	93.05	104.56	▼ 11.51	▼ 22.20
Mon 1/4/2016	@ Fairfield₂₂₃	L 71.50 - 76.05	L 85-97	4-8	101.29	110.92	▲ 9.63	101.87	122.42	▼ 20.55	▼ 10.92
Sat 1/9/2016	@ Harvard₁₆₀	L 61.32 - 69.24	L 70-77	4-9	93.50	102.92	▲ 9.42	99.51	105.53	▼ 6.02	▲ 3.40
Tue 1/12/2016	vs Canisius₂₃₅	W 75.33 - 71.34	W 80-69	5-9	105.88	110.32	▲ 4.44	105.86	98.51	▲ 7.35	▲ 11.79
Sat 1/16/2016	vs Pine Manor	---	W 121-56	6-9	---	---	---	---	---	---	---
Sat 1/23/2016	vs Harvard₁₆₀	L 65.19 - 65.67	W 63-50	7-9	93.50	92.54	▼ 0.96	99.51	76.45	▲ 23.06	▲ 22.10
Fri 1/29/2016	vs Columbia₁₁₈	L 68.25 - 72.07	L 60-77	7-10	99.51	84.58	▼ 14.93	110.09	120.11	▼ 10.02	▼ 24.95
Sat 1/30/2016	vs Cornell₂₇₆	W 76.11 - 68.46	L 73-77	7-11	101.12	90.67	▼ 10.45	96.19	104.23	▼ 8.04	▼ 18.49
Fri 2/5/2016	@ Penn₂₇₃	L 67.64 - 68.65	L 64-71	7-12	100.53	90.06	▼ 10.47	96.80	97.08	▼ 0.28	▼ 10.75
Sat 2/6/2016	@ Princeton₆₇	L 62.77 - 79.30	L 70-83	7-13	93.50	110.61	▲ 17.11	111.16	122.84	▼ 11.68	▲ 5.43
Fri 2/12/2016	vs Yale₄₉	L 61.02 - 71.52	L 65-75	7-14	87.34	84.75	▼ 2.59	107.93	105.70	▲ 2.23	▼ 0.36
Sat 2/13/2016	vs Brown₂₆₆	W 76.38 - 69.76	W 87-70	8-14	103.75	120.27	▲ 16.52	100.32	99.98	▲ 0.34	▲ 16.86
Fri 2/19/2016	@ Cornell₂₇₆	L 71.93 - 72.51	W 78-66	9-14	101.12	101.60	▲ 0.48	96.19	80.20	▲ 15.99	▲ 16.47
Sat 2/20/2016	@ Columbia₁₁₈	L 64.44 - 75.94	L 54-73	9-15	99.51	91.44	▼ 8.07	110.09	109.78	▲ 0.31	▼ 7.76
Fri 2/26/2016	@ Brown₂₆₆	L 72.29 - 73.79	L 83-84 (OT)	9-16	103.75	110.06	▲ 6.31	100.32	102.72	▼ 2.40	▲ 3.91
Sat 2/27/2016	@ Yale₄₉	L 57.16 - 75.30	L 71-76 (OT)	9-17	87.34	104.53	▲ 17.19	107.93	97.08	▲ 10.85	▲ 28.04
Fri 3/4/2016	vs Penn₂₇₃	W 71.60 - 64.85	W 72-64	10-17	100.53	101.43	▲ 0.90	96.80	97.04	▼ 0.24	▲ 0.66
Sat 3/5/2016	vs Princeton₆₇	L 66.73 - 75.36	L 65-84	10-18	93.50	89.94	▼ 3.56	111.16	122.04	▼ 10.88	▼ 14.44
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---
		---			---	---	---	---	---	---	---

Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.

CURIOUS TRENDS:

	When facing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, Dartmouth often performs better than normal. Dartmouth is more efficient than usual 68% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.30%. In their other contests, Dartmouth performs better than the norm 13% of the time.
	Dartmouth does better vs. clubs that effectively clean the offensive glass. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 14.20, Dartmouth performs above average 80% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 35% of the time.
	Dartmouth performs better against squads that favor a faster tempo. When facing teams that have a pace vs. AO greater than 69.30, Dartmouth is more efficient than normal 69% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 27% of the time.

HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:

SUMMARY	Rk	AP%	Rec (WinPct)		RQ	Conference	Pace	Con	SOS	PTF	AFH	ASR

OFFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

DEFENSE	Eff	FTAR	FT%	FGAR	FG%	3PAR	3P%	MRAR	MR%	NPAR	NP%	PPSt	PPSC	SCC%	%3PA	%MRA	%NPA	Prox

SUMMARY	Rk		AP%		Rec (WinPct)		RQ		Conference		Pace		Con		SOS		PTF		AFH		ASR

OFFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox

DEFENSE	Eff		FTAR		FT%		FGAR		FG%		3PAR		3P%		MRAR		MR%		NPAR		NP%		PPSt		PPSC		SCC%		%3PA		%MRA		%NPA		Prox