TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2022-23 ECU  16-17 (0.485)  |  American
All-Play Percentage: 0.500 (183rd)
Schedule Strength: 0.498 (135th)
Record Quality: 0.020 (161st)
Avg. Season Rank: 207.36 (209th)
Pace: 67.90 (185th)
Momentum: 2.36 (73rd)
Off. Momentum: 0.41 (186th)
Def. Momentum: 1.95 (37th)
Consistency: -10.14 (298th)
Res. Consistency: -13.45 (274th)
Away From Home: 0.80 (42nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: 1.24 (25th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 3, 2023. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 100.94 28.83 68.91 85.24 41.34 33.26 31.84 18.63 35.03 33.35 54.36 11.03 17.85 5.90 39.02 21.86 39.12 2.00
RANK: 208th 43rd 289th 155th 303rd 100th 301st 329th 307th 45th 309th 162nd 22nd 107th 116th 332nd 44th 131st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 102.12 26.54 -- 84.97 43.32 28.97 33.51 20.95 33.81 35.05 57.12 11.50 15.50 5.03 34.09 24.65 41.26 1.93
RANK: 156th 235th -- 186th 143rd 97th 145th 58th 25th 352nd 110th 233rd 292nd 142nd 90th 46th 353rd 345th

ANALYSIS:
If you see ECU on the schedule, you will likely get one of the average to below-average teams in college hoops. They have a record of 16-17 and are ranked 183rd overall (out of 363) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 11 schools in the AAC (average ranking 113.2), they're currently ranked as our #10 team in the conference.

ECU will likely call on their defense to win a majority of their games. The team is ranked 156th in defensive efficiency and allows fewer than 103 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. ECU does a bang-up job preventing the opposition from draining jumpers in between the three-point line and the low post. They're ranked 25th in Division I in defensive mid-range field goal percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 33.8% of their attempts from that distance. Due to this fact, AO will take nowhere near as many mid-range shots as they typically would and, as a result, only 24.7% of AO's field goal attempts will come from those in-between locations.

ECU doesn't perform as well offensively as they do defensively. The team is ranked 208th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 101 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. ECU fares worse than most teams when it comes to converting from locations close to the hoop. The team is ranked 309th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 54.4% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. If ECU does have a strength offensively, it would have to be the team's knack for obtaining second-chance opportunities from offensive rebounds. The squad has a rating of 17.85 in potential points off of second chances vs. AO, which ranks 22nd in all of college hoops.

On the road, ECU performs somewhat better than their norm, as the squad is nationally ranked 42nd in our away-from-home metric.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that allow more chances at the line, ECU often performs worse than normal. ECU is more efficient than usual 20% of the time when facing teams that have a defensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 27.68. In their other contests, ECU performs better than the norm 70% of the time.
ECU does better vs. clubs that shoot the ball well from the field. When playing squads that have an offensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 45.19%, ECU performs above average 80% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 44% of the time.
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox