TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Auburn  13-14 (0.481)  |  SEC
All-Play Percentage: 0.823 (64th)
Schedule Strength: 0.742 (52nd)
Record Quality: 0.143 (104th)
Avg. Season Rank: 75.94 (71st)
Pace: 71.90 (69th)
Momentum: -2.70 (289th)
Off. Momentum: -0.64 (246th)
Def. Momentum: -2.06 (273rd)
Consistency: -8.14 (74th)
Res. Consistency: -10.84 (104th)
Away From Home: 0.22 (164th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -1.24 (208th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 109.02 29.68 73.33 82.01 45.78 35.45 34.34 17.91 40.48 28.64 63.24 10.69 14.47 5.68 43.23 21.84 34.93 2.08
RANK: 40th 21st 104th 177th 71st 42nd 156th 319th 90th 149th 57th 186th 86th 94th 39th 321st 147th 266th

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 96.07 23.55 -- 83.03 41.93 31.42 32.51 21.27 37.99 30.33 54.44 14.30 11.45 3.69 37.85 25.62 36.53 2.01
RANK: 98th 131st -- 208th 85th 209th 96th 99th 163rd 272nd 51st 337th 98th 39th 195th 80th 260th 218th

ANALYSIS:
Despite what their win percentage might indicate, Auburn is a good team that can cause more than enough trouble for most opponents. Carrying a record of 13-14, they are currently rated #64 overall (out of 357) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 14 schools in the SEC (average ranking 61.5), they're currently ranked as our #9 team in the conference.

Auburn has a reasonably potent offensive attack. Occupying the #40 slot in our offensive efficiency rankings, they will score about 109 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Auburn does a super job in their efforts to get to the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 29.68 vs. AO, they are ranked 21st in the nation at getting to the charity stripe, where the team shoots a rather mediocre 73.3%. Auburn will also make a concerted effort to fire off quite a few three-pointers each game. The team ranks 39th in ratio of three-point attempts to total field goal attempts. When it comes to actually making their three-point attempts, the squad shoots a so-so 34.3% from beyond the arc vs. AO. If Auburn does have a glaring weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's penchant for allowing too many easy buckets off of giveaways. The squad has a rating of 14.30 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of steals, which ranks 21st-worst in the college game.

Auburn is also a fairly decent team on the defensive end of the court. The team ranks 98th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 96 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Auburn is one of the better teams when it comes to not allowing opponents to convert scoring chances off of offensive rebounds. The squad allows AO to convert only 3.7% of all second-chance opportunities (ranked 39th in the NCAA). Auburn has also been pretty good preventing teams from hitting shots in the paint. They are ranked 51st in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on only 54.4% of their attempts from close-up.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When facing teams that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot, Auburn often performs worse than normal. Auburn is more efficient than usual 27% of the time when facing teams that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 39.32%. In their other contests, Auburn performs better than the norm 69% of the time.
Auburn does better vs. clubs that effectively clean the offensive glass. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 16.63, Auburn performs above average 78% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 39% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Pearl gets 600th win with Auburn’s victory in season finale
(3/6/2021 7:53:22 PM) Allen Flanigan scored 17 of his 22 points in the second half and Auburn pulled away late to beat Mississippi State 78-71 on Saturday and give Bruce Pearl his 600th coaching victory in the Tigers' season finale.
Bruce Pearl gets 600th win with Auburn’s victory in season finale
(3/6/2021 3:42:35 PM) Allen Flanigan scored 17 of his 22 points in the second half and Auburn pulled away late to beat Mississippi State 78-71 on Saturday and give Bruce Pearl his 600th coaching victory in the Tigers' season finale.
Pearl gets 600th win with Auburn's victory in season finale
(3/6/2021 3:26:18 PM) AUBURN, Ala. (AP) — Allen Flanigan scored 17 of his 22 points in the second half and Auburn pulled away late to beat Mississippi State 78-71 on Saturday and give Bruce Pearl his 600th coaching victory in the Tigers' season…
Tennessee basketball wilts at Auburn for sixth straight loss to Tigers
(2/27/2021 3:34:48 PM) Tennessee basketball has lost six straight games to Auburn, including three in a row at Auburn Arena.
Flanigan scores 23, leads Auburn past No. 25 Tennessee 77-72
(2/27/2021 2:40:18 PM) Allen Flanigan scored a season-high 23 points and had seven rebounds to lead Auburn to a 77-72 victory over No. 25 Tennessee on Saturday. The Tigers (12-13, 6-10 Southeastern Conference) snapped a three-game losing streak even without freshman point guard Sha…
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox