Automated Team Capsule for 2015-16 Idaho21-13 (0.618) | Big Sky
All-Play Percentage: 0.374 (220th)
Schedule Strength: 0.356 (315th)
Record Quality: -0.028 (185th)
Avg. Season Rank: 203.25 (202nd)
Pace: 67.54 (295th)
Momentum: -0.08 (170th)
Off. Momentum: 3.58 (26th)
Def. Momentum: -3.66 (323rd)
Consistency: -7.66 (36th)
Res. Consistency: -9.80 (58th)
Away From Home: 1.44 (52nd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.01 (98th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 4, 2016. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
96.06
67.53
31.04
71.77
78.08
32.40
41.49
25.27
8.98
35.55
23.76
8.55
36.00
29.05
14.86
51.15
8.63
14.28
5.82
32.36
30.43
37.21
1.95
RANK:
267th
291st
74th
111th
322nd
317th
268th
286th
256th
138th
185th
176th
143rd
160th
292nd
338th
299th
213th
261st
258th
144th
99th
81st
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
101.46
67.55
31.83
--
80.03
34.23
42.78
33.87
11.65
34.39
19.30
6.80
35.22
26.86
15.79
58.78
12.74
15.47
7.94
42.32
24.12
33.56
2.09
RANK:
153rd
61st
286th
--
87th
84th
121st
340th
320th
141st
19th
16th
136th
98th
96th
145th
310th
203rd
264th
343rd
21st
120th
26th
ANALYSIS: Regardless of what the win percentage says, Idaho isn't a very good team this year. Carrying a record of 21-13, they are currently rated #220 overall (out of 351) in All-Play Percentage this season. Of the 12 schools in the Big Sky (average ranking 255.4), they're currently ranked as our #4 team in the conference.
Idaho will likely call on their defense to win a majority of their games. The team is ranked 153rd in defensive efficiency and allows fewer than 102 points for every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Idaho has been doing fairly decent work to prevent opponents from getting off shots from the field. The club is ranked 87th in Division I in defensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 80.03 vs. AO.
The offense for Idaho, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the defense is. The team is ranked 267th in offensive efficiency, scoring about 96 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Idaho will have a really tough time winning games when taking into consideration their shooting percentage near the basket. The team is ranked 338th in near-proximity field goal percentage, making only 51.2% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. Idaho is also one of the more inferior teams in the college game when it comes to maximizing opportunities to score on offense. The team is nationally ranked 322nd in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of only 78.08 vs. AO.
Idaho is one of the more consistent teams in Division I (presently ranked 36th in consistency), so forecasting the outcomes of their future contests tends to be easier than the norm.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
When playing teams that tend to capitalize off breakaway opportunities, Idaho usually performs worse than average. Idaho is more efficient than normal 33% of the time when facing clubs that have a potential point rate off steals vs. AO greater than 10.26. In all other contests, Idaho performs better than average 71% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.