TIME-DEPENDENT RATINGS
TIME-INDEPENDENT RATINGS
   Automated Team Capsule for 2020-21 Georgia Tech  17-9 (0.654)  |  ACC
All-Play Percentage: 0.899 (37th)
Schedule Strength: 0.724 (58th)
Record Quality: 0.336 (35th)
Avg. Season Rank: 46.83 (45th)
Pace: 67.92 (274th)
Momentum: 0.60 (146th)
Off. Momentum: 0.84 (142nd)
Def. Momentum: -0.24 (157th)
Consistency: -8.89 (138th)
Res. Consistency: -13.34 (231st)
Away From Home: 1.45 (57th)
Paper Tiger Factor: 0.84 (63rd)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category.
Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement.
Includes games through April 5, 2021. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 111.48 24.16 74.75 82.72 50.01 29.21 36.61 23.72 39.81 29.78 71.27 16.39 10.56 5.47 35.31 28.68 36.01 1.99
RANK: 22nd 192nd 63rd 144th 4th 228th 55th 157th 114th 93rd 2nd 6th 290th 113th 248th 169th 111th 101st

DEFENSE Eff Upc FTAR FT% FGAR FGMR FG% 3PAR 3PMR 3P% MRAR MRMR MR% NPAR NPMR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
RATING: 95.10 20.39 -- 80.41 43.59 28.70 35.56 23.30 36.03 28.40 57.91 8.69 12.85 5.37 35.70 28.98 35.32 2.00
RANK: 80th 33rd -- 89th 155th 98th 257th 186th 95th 189th 137th 34th 188th 224th 109th 213th 221st 240th

ANALYSIS:
While this site doesn't quite consider them to be in the national title hunt, Georgia Tech has the potential to be a formidable opponent for many in Division I. They have a record of 17-9 and are ranked 37th overall (out of 357) in the latest Haslametrics ratings. Of the 15 schools in the ACC (average ranking 71.7), they're currently ranked as our #5 team in the conference.

Georgia Tech is undoubtedly one of the best in the business on offense. The team is rated 22nd in offensive efficiency, scoring more than 111 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Georgia Tech is one of the nation's most effective teams finishing close to the iron. The team is ranked second in the country in near-proximity field goal percentage, making approximately 71.3% of their attempts from up-close vs. AO. The squad likewise lands in the top-10 in overall offensive field goal percentage and makes good on about 50.0% of their total attempts vs. AO. Georgia Tech also does a pretty good job of protecting the ball when they have possession and not allowing quick and easy baskets off of their own turnovers. The team's rating vs. AO for potential breakaway points allowed off of steals is 8.69, which ranks #34 in the country.

Georgia Tech is also a fairly decent team on the defensive end of the court. The team ranks 80th nationally in defensive efficiency, allowing about 95 points every 100 trips upcourt vs. AO. Georgia Tech thrives on scoring fast and easy points off of steals. They're ranked sixth in potential points off of breakaway steals vs. AO with a rating of 16.39. Georgia Tech also does a pretty solid job avoiding careless fouls and minimizing opponents' opportunities from the free throw line. With a defensive free throw attempt rate of 20.39 vs. AO, they are currently rated 33rd in the country in that category.
SORTABLE SCHEDULE / RESULTS:
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location.
Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Georgia Tech does worse vs. clubs that are more proficient at draining the mid-range shot. When playing squads that have an offensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 40.41%, Georgia Tech performs above average 22% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 65% of the time.
Georgia Tech performs worse against squads that allow a higher number of conversions off of the offensive glass. When facing teams that have a defensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 4.46%, Georgia Tech is more efficient than normal 25% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 61% of the time.
When playing teams that allow opponents to shoot well from the field, Georgia Tech usually performs worse than average. Georgia Tech is more efficient than normal 39% of the time when facing clubs that have a defensive field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 39.89%. In all other contests, Georgia Tech performs better than average 75% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Technical Tidbits 3/19: Georgia Tech begins NCAA Tournament today - From The Rumble Seat
(3/19/2021 6:00:00 AM) Technical Tidbits 3/19: Georgia Tech begins NCAA Tournament today  From The Rumble Seat
Georgia Tech's Moses Wright out for 1st, 2nd Round Games of 2021 NCAA Tournament
(3/17/2021 11:06:36 PM) Georgia Tech forward Moses Wright will miss his team's first-round NCAA Division I men's basketball matchup against Loyola-Chicago on Friday, per Jeff Goodman and Brett McMurphy of Stadium ...
Tech will start the NCAA Tournament down the ACC POY Moses Wright
(3/17/2021 11:04:35 PM) Rumors and rumblings have been strong over the last 36 hours since Georgia Tech men's basketball coach Josh Pastner
Loyola-Chicago, Ga. Tech meet in First Round - HOI ABC
(3/17/2021 4:39:57 PM) No. 9 seed Georgia Tech (17-8) vs. No. 8 seed Loyola of Chicago (24-4) NCAA Tournament First Round, Hinkle Fieldhouse, Indianapolis; Friday, 3 p.m. EDT BOTTOM LINE: Georgia Tech is preparing to face Loyola of Chicago, with the winner advancing to the Round of…
Georgia Tech 80, Florida State 75 — Condensed Game - Seminoles.com
(3/14/2021 1:19:33 AM) Georgia Tech 80, Florida State 75 — Condensed Game  Seminoles.com
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY: Select data to plot:

HASLAMETRICS TEAM HISTORY: Select data to view:
SUMMARY Rk AP% Rec (WinPct) RQ Conference Pace Con SOS PTF AFH ASR
OFFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox
DEFENSE Eff FTAR FT% FGAR FG% 3PAR 3P% MRAR MR% NPAR NP% PPSt PPSC SCC% %3PA %MRA %NPA Prox