Automated Team Capsule for 2023-24 Georgetown9-23 (0.281) | Big East
All-Play Percentage: 0.438 (205th)
Schedule Strength: 0.637 (80th)
Record Quality: -0.144 (256th)
Avg. Season Rank: 206.40 (204th)
Pace: 67.28 (225th)
Momentum: 0.05 (166th)
Off. Momentum: 1.84 (87th)
Def. Momentum: -1.79 (261st)
Consistency: -9.09 (168th)
Res. Consistency: -12.37 (201st)
Away From Home: 1.75 (27th)
Paper Tiger Factor: -0.37 (120th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 8, 2024. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
107.07
67.21
29.80
71.53
85.76
36.72
42.82
35.42
12.31
34.76
21.15
7.78
36.79
29.19
16.63
56.96
8.85
19.22
7.59
41.30
24.66
34.04
2.07
RANK:
135th
229th
48th
210th
165th
215th
240th
65th
76th
161st
228th
255th
273rd
251st
239th
198th
318th
7th
19th
60th
233rd
251st
298th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
110.65
67.35
28.18
--
85.31
39.78
46.63
31.11
10.90
35.04
21.36
7.94
37.18
32.83
20.94
63.77
13.69
16.29
7.76
36.47
25.04
38.49
1.98
RANK:
294th
146th
264th
--
169th
284th
307th
164th
192nd
223rd
120th
85th
101st
274th
331st
344th
323rd
338th
355th
157th
115th
272nd
244th
ANALYSIS: They're far from the worst of the worst, but Georgetown should not be a terribly frightening opponent for most clubs. Their record this season is 9-23, and the club is ranked 205th overall (out of 362) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. Of the 11 schools in the Big East (average ranking 73.5), they're currently ranked as our #10 team in the conference.
Based on the data, Georgetown will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 107 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #135 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. Georgetown appears to be one of the top-notch offensive rebounding teams you will find this year. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 19.22 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked seventh in the NCAA), and they convert 7.6% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 19th) as well. Georgetown also does a really good job to acquire opportunities from the free throw line. With a free throw attempt rate of 29.80 vs. AO, they are ranked 48th in the nation at getting to the charity stripe, where the team shoots a rather mediocre 71.5%. If Georgetown does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's penchant for allowing too many easy buckets off of giveaways. The squad has a rating of 13.69 vs. AO in potential points allowed off of steals, which ranks 40th-worst in the college game.
Unfortunately, Georgetown is not even remotely close to being as good on defense as they are on offense. The team is ranked 294th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 111 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Georgetown is one of the very worst teams in the game when it comes to preventing opponents from scoring off of offensive rebounds. The team allows AO to convert 7.8% of all second-chance opportunities (eighth from the bottom nationally), and with a rating of 16.29, they're 338th in potential points surrendered off of the offensive boards as well. Georgetown also fares terribly when attempting to stop opponents from converting from the inside. The team is ranked 344th in the country in defensive near-proximity percentage, allowing AO to make good on 63.8% of their attempts from close-up.
On the road, Georgetown performs somewhat better than their norm, as the squad is nationally ranked 27th in our away-from-home metric.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Georgetown does better vs. clubs that effectively clean the offensive glass. When playing squads that have an offensive second-chance potential point rate vs. AO greater than 12.71, Georgetown performs above average 73% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 12% of the time.
Georgetown performs better against squads that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds. When facing teams that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 6.38%, Georgetown is more efficient than normal 80% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 23% of the time.
When playing teams that find ways to get to the free throw line, Georgetown usually performs better than average. Georgetown is more efficient than normal 64% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive free throw attempt rate vs. AO greater than 25.83. In all other contests, Georgetown performs better than average 22% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
HASLAMETRICS ALL-PLAY PERCENTAGE RANKING BY DAY:Select data to plot:
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.