Automated Team Capsule for 2021-22 Georgetown6-25 (0.194) | Big East
All-Play Percentage: 0.529 (169th)
Schedule Strength: 0.667 (41st)
Record Quality: -0.186 (269th)
Avg. Season Rank: 162.89 (157th)
Pace: 70.56 (65th)
Momentum: 0.89 (138th)
Off. Momentum: 0.97 (139th)
Def. Momentum: -0.08 (152nd)
Consistency: -8.42 (96th)
Res. Consistency: -10.22 (67th)
Away From Home: 0.37 (143rd)
Paper Tiger Factor: -2.38 (298th)
NOTE: All data below reflects predicted performance against the "AO" (average opponent), a fictitious opponent who represents the average in every stat category. Hover over column headers or visit "ABOUT" page for an explanation of each measurement. Includes games through April 4, 2022. Data shown on this page is based on time-independent ratings.
OFFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
103.76
70.49
26.59
74.17
86.17
36.41
42.26
31.99
11.22
35.06
21.89
7.42
33.91
32.29
17.78
55.05
12.92
20.73
6.76
37.12
25.41
37.47
2.00
RANK:
108th
69th
70th
96th
57th
167th
242nd
156th
136th
106th
229th
279th
327th
47th
118th
286th
73rd
1st
28th
196th
254th
74th
111th
DEFENSE
Eff
Upc
FTAR
FT%
FGAR
FGMR
FG%
3PAR
3PMR
3P%
MRAR
MRMR
MR%
NPAR
NPMR
NP%
PPSt
PPSC
SCC%
%3PA
%MRA
%NPA
Prox
RATING:
104.22
70.63
21.42
--
84.57
38.01
44.94
34.50
12.55
36.36
20.85
7.56
36.24
29.22
17.90
61.27
10.96
14.50
5.66
40.79
24.65
34.55
2.06
RANK:
245th
298th
70th
--
225th
251st
236th
305th
330th
306th
71st
55th
113th
203rd
243rd
266th
167th
259th
269th
284th
62nd
177th
103rd
ANALYSIS: As an average to slightly above-average foe, Georgetown should probably not be discounted by opponents this year. Their record this season is 6-25, and the club is ranked 169th overall (out of 358) in Haslametrics' most recent ratings. Of the 11 schools in the Big East (average ranking 66.1), they're currently ranked as the worst team in the conference.
Based on the data, Georgetown will likely find more success on offense than on defense. Scoring about 104 points for every 100 possessions vs. AO, they currently occupy the #108 slot in the rankings for offensive efficiency. Georgetown appears to be one of the top-notch offensive rebounding teams you will find this year. Against AO, the squad has a rating of 20.73 in potential points scored off of second chances (ranked first in the NCAA), and they convert 6.8% of their second-chance opportunities (ranked 28th) as well. Georgetown also does a pretty decent job in most cases to maximize opportunities to score on offense. The team is ranked 57th in the NCAA in offensive field goal attempt rate with a rating of 86.17 vs. AO. As far as making those field goal attempts goes, the team is somewhat middle-of-the-road, converting about 42.3% of them vs. AO. If Georgetown does have a weakness offensively, it would have to be the team's inability to drain mid-range jumpers. The squad makes just 33.9% of their mid-range field goal attempts vs. AO, which ranks 32nd-worst in the nation.
The defense for Georgetown, on the other hand, isn't nearly as efficient as the offense is. The team is ranked 245th in defensive efficiency, allowing about 104 points every 100 possessions vs. AO. Georgetown tends to struggle a bit against teams that shoot the three. They rank 306th nationally in defensive three-point percentage, allowing AO to make 36.4% of their attempts from afar.
Projections are based on present-day ratings. Stars indicate games played at a neutral location. Game efficiencies only account for data before a contest has gone analytically final and are adjusted to extract home-court advantage.
CURIOUS TRENDS:
Georgetown does better vs. clubs that have trouble defending the mid-range shot. When playing squads that have a defensive mid-range field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 37.68%, Georgetown performs above average 89% of the time. Against all other opponents, the team performs better than the norm 46% of the time.
Georgetown performs worse against squads that do a nice job converting inside the paint. When facing teams that have an offensive near-proximity field goal percentage vs. AO greater than 57.02%, Georgetown is more efficient than normal 46% of the time. In their other contests, the team is more efficient 89% of the time.
When playing teams that convert more frequently off of offensive rebounds, Georgetown usually performs worse than average. Georgetown is more efficient than normal 33% of the time when facing clubs that have an offensive second-chance conversion percentage vs. AO greater than 5.60%. In all other contests, Georgetown performs better than average 74% of the time.
LATEST NEWS ITEMS:
Richmond leads Seton Hall past Georgetown 73-68 (3/2/2022 9:45:54 PM) NEWARK, N.J. (AP) — Kadary Richmond had 12 points and 10 assists to lead Seton Hall to a 73-68 win over Georgetown on Wednesday night.
Patrick Ewing gets statement of support from Georgetown AD (3/2/2022 1:53:38 PM) WASHINGTON (AP) — Georgetown men’s basketball coach Patrick Ewing received a public show of support from athletic director Lee Reed on Wednesday, hours before the team was going to try to end its school-record 18-game losing streak. After acknowledging the “d…
AD supports Ewing amid Hoyas' 18-game skid (3/2/2022 1:25:40 PM) Georgetown men's basketball coach Patrick Ewing received a public show of support from athletic director Lee Reed on Wednesday as the team is amid an 18-game losing streak.
Note: Haslametrics.com does not own any of the logos depicted within this site, we do not have the power to grant usage rights
to anyone. All team logos and names contained within this site are properties of the NCAA. Please source any information
obtained from this site by providing a link back.
